Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Proprietor (Secretary) vs Deputy Labour Commissioner
2024 Latest Caselaw 32329 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 32329 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 November, 2024

Kerala High Court

Proprietor (Secretary) vs Deputy Labour Commissioner on 8 November, 2024

Author: N.Nagaresh

Bench: N.Nagaresh

                                              2024:KER:83702

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                         PRESENT

           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH

FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 / 17TH KARTHIKA, 1946

                  WP(C) NO. 6991 OF 2024

PETITIONERS:

    1    PROPRIETOR (SECRETARY),
         PERSONA TEXTILES PALACE,
         PERLASSERY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK,
         PERALASSERY P.O.,
         MUNDALLUR, PIN - 670622

    2    PRESIDENT,
         ERLASSERY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK,
         PERLASSERY P.O., MUNDALLUR,
         PIN - 670622


         BY ADVS.
         BINDUMOL JOSEPH
         VINODKUMAR CHAMBALON
         BEENA JOSEPH
         RIYAS M.B.
         M.V.RAHUL



RESPONDENTS:

    1    DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER,
         AUTHORITY UNDER MINIMUM WAGES ACT,
         1948, KANNUR, PIN - 670001

    2    ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER,
         2ND CIRCLE, CHANDROTH BUILDING,
         NETHAJI ROAD,
         KANNUR, PIN - 670001
                                             2024:KER:83702
WP(C) No.6991 of 2024
                           2




    3    STATE OF KERALA,
         REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO LABOUR & AMP
         SKILLS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
         THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001


         BY ADVS.
         SHRI.ASOK M.CHERIAN
         SABEENA P.ISMAIL


     THIS WRIT PETITION    (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP       FOR
ADMISSION ON 08.11.2024,   THE COURT ON THE SAME        DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                 2024:KER:83702
WP(C) No.6991 of 2024
                              3



                         JUDGMENT

Dated this the 8th day of November, 2024

The 1st petitioner is the Secretary of the Peralassary

Service Co-operative Bank Limited. The 2 nd petitioner is the

President to the Bank. The petitioners are aggrieved by order

of the 1st respondent in MCP No.50/2016 dated 03.10.2023.

2. The 2nd respondent-Assistant Labour Officer

filed a Claim Petition alleging that four employees working in

the Persona Textile Palace, which is a Unit of the Peralassery

Service Co-operative Bank, have not been paid prescribed

minimum wages as per G.O.(MS) No.132/2010/LBR for the

period from April, 2015 to September, 2015. The Claim

Petition was allowed as per Ext.P5 order. By Ext.P5, it has

been directed to pay arrears of minimum wages to the four

employees named therein.

2024:KER:83702

3. The petitioners are before this Court

challenging Ext.P5. The contention of the petitioners is that

Ext.P6 Minimum Wages Notification is intended to apply only

to the Garment Manufacturing Sector. The petitioners are

running a Textile Shop. Therefore, the minimum wages

notified under Ext.P6 cannot be applied to the textile run by

the petitioners. On that ground alone, Ext.P5 impugned order

is liable to be set aside.

4. Government Pleader entered appearance

and resisted the writ petition. The Government Pleader

submitted that the G.O. number mentioned as G.O.(MS)

No.132/2010/LBR dated 06.11.2010 is only a typographical

error. In fact, the G.O.(MS) No.100/2009/EMP dated

23.07.2009 will apply to the petitioners and the petitioners will

have to pay minimum wages at the rate prescribed under the

said G.O.(MS) No.100/2009/EMP.

2024:KER:83702

5. I have heard the learned counsel for the

petitioners and the learned Government Pleader representing

the respondents.

6. Going through Ext.P5 order, it is evident that

the directions to pay arrears of minimum wages have been

passed based on G.O.(MS) No.132/2010/LBR dated

06.11.2010.

7. The Government Pleader would submit that it

is only a typographical error in mentioning the number and

date of the G.O. The G.O.(MS) No.100/2009/EMP dated

23.07.2009 will apply to the petitioners.

8. If a different G.O. is to apply, then the

Minimum Wages Authority has to pass orders taking into

consideration the said G.O. As long as the G.O. referred to in

Ext.P5 will not apply to the petitioners, the consequential

direction cannot be sustained.

2024:KER:83702

9. In the circumstances of the case, Ext.P5 is

set aside. It is made clear that it will be open to respondents 1

and 2 to take up the issue as per G.O.(MS) No.100/2009/EMP

dated 23.07.2009, in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

N.NAGARESH JUDGE spk 2024:KER:83702

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 6991/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE CLAIM PETITION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2 ND RESPONDENT

Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER STATEMENT FILED BY THE PETITIONERS

Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE REJOINDER FILED BY THE 2 ND RESPONDENT DATED 24.01.2019

Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE CHIEF AFFIDAVIT DATED 26.04.2022 FILED BY THE 2 ND RESPONDENT

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN MCP 50/2016 DATED 03.10.2023 ISSUED BY THE 1 ST RESPONDENT

Exhibit P6 A TRUE COPY OF G.O.(MS) 132/2010/LBR DATED 06/11/2010

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter