Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 32323 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 November, 2024
1
Crl. Rev.Pet. No.2411 of 2013
2024:KER:83276
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 / 17TH KARTHIKA, 1946
CRL.REV.PET NO. 2411 OF 2013
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 23.08.2013 IN CRA NO.310 OF
2012 BEFORE THE COURT OF SESSION, KOZHIKODE DIVISION ARISING OUT
OF THE ORDER DATED 27.04.2012 IN MC NO.22 OF 2011 OF JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS, PAYYOLI
REVISION PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1 E.C.MOHAMMED
AGED 59 YEARS
S/O.ABDULLA, KOROTH HOUSE,
NELLIYERI MANIKKOTH,
MELADI AMSOM DESOM,
KOYILANDY TALUK,
KOZHIKODE DISTRICT -673 001
2 NABEESA
AGED 49 YEARS
W/O.E.C.MAMMED,
KOROTH HOUSE, NELLIYERI MANIKKOTH,
MELADI AMSOM DESOM, KOYILANDY TALUK,
KOZHIKODE DISTRICT -673 001
3 SHIHAB
AGED 27 YEARS
S/O.E.C.MAMMED, KOROTH HOUSE, NELLIYERI MANIKKOTH,
MELADI AMSOM DESOM, KOYILANDY TALUK, KOZHIKODE
DISTRICT -673 001
BY ADV SRI.NIRMAL. S
2
Crl. Rev.Pet. No.2411 of 2013
2024:KER:83276
RESPONDENT/APPELLATN/PETITIONER & STATE:
1 KUNHAYISHA
AGED 57 YEARS
D/O.MOIDEEN, AL ZAHIR HOUSE,
MELADI AMSOM KIZHU DESOM,
KOYILANDY TALUK,
KOZHIKODE -673 001
2 STATE OF KERALA
REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM-682031.
C.N. PRABHAKARAN - SR.P.P
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
08.11.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
3
Crl. Rev.Pet. No.2411 of 2013
2024:KER:83276
P.G. AJITHKUMAR, J
-------------------------------------------------
Crl. R.P. No. 2411 of 2013
-------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 08th day of November, 2024
ORDER
Revision petitioners are the respondents in M.C. No.22 of
2011 on the files of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class,
Payyoli. Order dated 27.04.2012 dismissing the petition was
challenged by the respondents by filing an appeal before the
Court of Sessions, Kozhikode. As per the judgment dated
23.08.2013, the appeal was allowed in part. Orders of
residence, maintenance and protection were granted. The said
judgment is under challenge in this revision petition filed under
Section 397 read with 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973.
2. This revision petition was filed in the year 2013.
3. Despite giving repeated directions, the petitioners did
not take proper steps to serve notice on the 2nd respondent, the
wife.
4. Today, when this matter is taken up for
2024:KER:83276
consideration, the learned counsel for the revision petitioners
would submit that although registered notice was sent to the
petitioners on 14.06.2024, they did not turn up yet. In the
circumstances, the learned counsel is also unable to take steps
in the present address of the 2nd respondent.
5. Having considered the fact that this revision petition
has been pending for the last 11 years and service of notice on
the 2nd respondent is not yet complete for want of taking steps
by the petitioners, I hold that this petition deserves to be
dismissed.
Accordingly, this revision petition is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Sd/-
P.G. AJITHKUMAR JUDGE SMF
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!