Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sudeepa.C.K vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 32265 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 32265 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 November, 2024

Kerala High Court

Sudeepa.C.K vs State Of Kerala on 8 November, 2024

                                 1

W.P.(C) No.23442 of 2019
                                                       2024:KER:83378

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                     PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISANKAR V. MENON

 FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 / 17TH KARTHIKA, 1946
                           WP(C) NO. 23442 OF 2019
PETITIONER:

              SUDEEPA.C.K.,
              AGED 44 YEARS, W/O. RAJEEVAN NAMBIAR,
              UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, KOLACHERY
              AIDED UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, P.O. KOLACHERY,
              KANNUR DISTRICT - 670 601.

              BY ADVS.
              KALEESWARAM RAJ
              SRI.VARUN C.VIJAY
              KUM.A.ARUNA
              KUM.THULASI K. RAJ
              SMT.MAITREYI SACHIDANANDA HEGDE

RESPONDENTS:

      1       STATE OF KERALA,
              REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
              GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

      2       THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS
              JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

      3       DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,
              OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,
              KANNUR - 670 001.

      4       THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
              REVENUE TOWER, COURT ROAD,
              TALIPARAMBA - 670 141.

      5       THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
              TALIPARAMBA - 670 141.
                                    2

W.P.(C) No.23442 of 2019
                                                              2024:KER:83378

      6       THE MANAGER
              KOLACHERRY AIDED UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, P.O.
              KOLLECHERRY, KANNUR - 670 601.

      7       PRATHIBHA
              UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT,
              KOLACHERRY AIDED UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL,
              P.O. KOLLECHERRY, KANNUR - 670 601.

              BY ADVS.
              SRI.MURALI PALLATH
              SMT.SONY K.B


       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
08.11.2024,        THE     COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED    THE
FOLLOWING:
                                3

W.P.(C) No.23442 of 2019
                                                          2024:KER:83378


                    HARISANKAR V. MENON, J.
                 ------------------------------------
                    W.P.(C) No.23442 of 2019
             ---------------------------------------------
            Dated this the 8th day of November, 2024

                              JUDGMENT

The petitioner was appointed as Upper Primary School

Assistant (UPSA) in the school managed by the 6th respondent

herein, on 12.01.2001 and she worked till 14.03.2001. Insofar as

on the basis of the law as it stood then, the petitioner had a claim

under the provisions of Rule 51A of Chapter XIV A of the Kerala

Education Rules (KER), the petitioner was again appointed on

04.06.2012 and worked till 28.03.2014. However, both the above

appointments were not approved, and the salary was also not paid

to the petitioner. Against the non-approval of the appointment as

above, though an appeal was preferred, by Ext.P4, the said appeal

stood rejected, essentially finding that the petitioner was

appointed in 2012 against the post on account of the exemption

given to the Headmistress from class charge and the said

additional post was not approved / created.

2. The petitioner was thereafter appointed again on

01.06.2016 against the retirement vacancy of one

Smt.N.P.Prasanna, who retired on 30.04.2016. There was one

2024:KER:83378

more vacancy on account of the promotion of one Smt.Shyamala,

to which the 7th respondent was appointed by the 6th respondent

herein.

3. However, the 6th respondent Manager later came to

know that the petitioner was not entitled for the Rule 51A claim,

since originally, she was not having a one-year approved service

and therefore, the petitioner stood terminated in the year 2019.

4. In the captioned writ petition, the petitioner only seeks

for a declaration as regards the period she worked as UPSA from

04.06.2012 to 28.03.2014 and from 01.06.2016 till the

termination in 2019 as also for a declaration that she was entitled

for the Rule 51A claim.

5. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner,

Smt.K.B.Sony, the learned Government Pleader and the learned

counsel for respondents 6 and 7.

6. The short issue arising for consideration is as regards

the appointment of the petitioner for the periods from 2012 to

2014 and from 2016 onwards.

7. It is seen that the petitioner was appointed in 2012 by

the 6th respondent Manager, since according to the Manager, the

petitioner had a claim with reference to the provisions of Rule 51A

2024:KER:83378

of Chapter XIV A of the KER. However, later, the Manager realised

that on account of the amendment to the provisions of Rule 51A,

pursuant to the Government Order in the year 2005, the petitioner

may not be entitled for the claim since she was not having one full

year service in an approved post. In the light of the above, the

petitioner, prima facie does not appear to be entitled for the

appointment with reference to the provisions of Rule 51A for the

period 04.06.2012 to 28.03.2014 as well as for the subsequent

period from 01.06.2016 also. In this connection, I also notice that

the judgment of the Apex Court in Manager, VKNM Vocational

Higher Secondary School v. State of Kerala and Others

[2016 (1) KHC 430], wherein the Apex Cout, has referred to the

amended provisions of Rule 7A (3) of Chapter XIV A read along

with 51A, and held that unless and until the claimant was having

a full one year service, the benefits could not be extended.

8. In such circumstances, I am of the opinion that the

petitioner may not be entitled for the reliefs claimed by her, though

originally, she was accommodated with reference to Rule 51A

claim as seen from Ext.P3, without noticing the subsequent

changes.

9. However, the question arises as to whether the

2024:KER:83378

petitioner is entitled for the benefit of salary for the period during

which she had admittedly worked with the school managed by the

6th respondent herein. The fact that the petitioner had put in

service as afore is not disputed by anyone. But the question with

respect to the eligibility of the petitioner for salary, especially with

reference to the findings contained in paragraph 42 of the Full

Bench judgment of this Court in Harikumar v. State of Kerala

[2003 (1) KLT 797], requires to be considered.

10. In such circumstances, while rejecting the prayers in

the writ petition, I permit the petitioner to file an appropriate

representation, pointing out the relevant facts and figures to the

1st respondent herein, who will consider the same after hearing

the petitioner as well as the 6th respondent Manager and take a

decision thereon, within a period of two months from the date of

receipt of an application in that regard.

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE anm

2024:KER:83378

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 23442/2019

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 12.1.2001.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE SCHOOL SENIORITY LIST OF 51 A CLAIMANT (INDIVIDUAL MANAGEMENT) DOWNLOADED FROM THE OFFICIAL WEBSITE OF GOVERNMENT OF KERALA.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 4.6.2012 APPOINTING THE PETITIONER AS UPSA.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22.12.2012 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE STAFF FIXATION ORDER DATED 28.4.2006.

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE ATTENDANCE REGISTER OF THE SCHOOL FOR THE YEAR 2012-13.

EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE ATTENDANCE REGISTER OF THE SCHOOL FOR THE YEAR 2013-14.

EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 1.6.2016 APPOINTING THE PETITIONER AS UPSA.

EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 24.7.2017 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 15.12.2017 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER.

2024:KER:83378

EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 27.12.2017 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P13 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 27.12.2012 ISSUED BY THE ADDITIONAL DPI (ACADEMIC).

EXHIBIT P14 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 30.10.2018 IN WPC NO.35234/2018.

EXHIBIT P15 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.10.2018 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P16 TRUE COPY OF THE GO(P) NO.134/2016/GEN.

EDN DATED 5.8.2016.

EXHIBIT P17 TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR DATED 9.11.2016 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P18 TRUE COPY OF THE GO(P) NO.199/2016/GEN.

EDN DATED 3.12.2016.

EXHIBIT P19 TRUE COPY OF THE G.O(RT) NO.2608/2018/G. EDN DATED 12.7.2018.

EXHIBIT P20 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 24.1.2019 ISSUED BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P21 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DATED 5.2.2019 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P22 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 12.2.2019 IN WPC NO.4158/2019.

EXHIBIT P23 TRUE COPY OF G.O(RT) NO.2878/2019/G.EDN DATED 16.7.2019.

Exhibit P24 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 2-09-2019 ISSUED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT MANAGER.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter