Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 31448 Ker
Judgement Date : 2 November, 2024
2024:KER:81584
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
SATURDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 / 11TH KARTHIKA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 34620 OF 2024
PETITIONER:
KRISHNADAS C
AGED 34 YEARS
S/O UNNIKRISHNAN C.,
CHOLAKKAD HOUSE, PARUDUR P.O.,
MANGALAM, PARUDUR, PALAKKAD DIST.,
PIN - 679305
BY ADV N.S.REHNA
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS,
SECRETARIAT,PALAYAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
PIN - 695001
2 STATE POLICE CHIEF & DGP OFFICE
KERALA STATE POLICE HEADQUARTERS
VAZHUTHAKKAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
PIN - 695010
3 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
VAIKOM POLICE STATION,
KOTTAYAM, VAIKOM,
PIN - 686141
4 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
KORATTY POLICE STATION,
KORATTY, THRISSUR DIST.,
PIN - 680308
WP(C)No. 34620 of 2024 2024:KER:81584
2
5 STATION HOUSE OFFICER
CHANKARAMKULAM POLICE STATION,
ALAMKODE. P. O., MALAPPURAM DIST.,
PIN - 679585
6 JINTO P V
AGED 38 YEARS
S/O VARGHESE,
THEKKUMTHALA HOUSE,
PALLATHATTIL, KATHIKUDAM,
KALLUR VADAKKUMMURY,
THRISSUR, PIN - 680308
SRI. P.S. APPU, GOVERNMENT PLEADER.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
02.11.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C)No. 34620 of 2024 2024:KER:81584
3
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 02nd day of November, 2024
The petitioner alleges that the police is
harassing him at the instance of the 6th respondent.
2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner
submits that an agreement has been signed between
the petitioner and the 6th respondent regarding the
construction of 6th respondent's residential house and
was entrusted with the petitioner. Later some
monetary disputes arose between the parties and the
6th respondent has caused the police to interfere and
threaten the petitioner.
WP(C)No. 34620 of 2024 2024:KER:81584
3. Learned Government Pleader submits on
instructions that, based on the 6 th respondent's
complaint, both parties were summoned to the police
station and they agreed to settle the dispute amicably.
4. In view of the above submission, the writ
petition is disposed of, directing the police not to
unnecessarily harass the petitioner or his family
members in connection with the monetary dispute
between him and the 6th respondent. Needless to say,
the police can interfere if the dispute gives rise to a
law and order situation.
Ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN
JUDGE SSK/02/11 WP(C)No. 34620 of 2024 2024:KER:81584
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 34620/2024
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT - P1 COMPLAINT DATED 27/09/2024 TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS NIL TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!