Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 31391 Ker
Judgement Date : 2 November, 2024
2024:KER:81473
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
SATURDAY,THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024/11TH KARTHIKA, 1946
BAIL APPL. NO. 8405 OF 2024
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 05.10.2024 IN CRMP
NO.5029 OF 2024 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,
KUNNAMKULAM
CRIME NO.810/2024 OF PERAMANGALAM POLICE STATION,
THRISSUR
PETITIONER/PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
JISHNU,
AGED 29 YEARS
S/O MOHANAN,IRIPPISSERY HOUSE,PUZHACKAL
AMBAKKAD DESOM,PUZHACKAL VILLAGE, THRISSUR
DISTRICT, PIN - 680553.
BY ADV K.R.PRATHISH
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/STATE & COMPLAINANT:
STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, PIN - 682031.
SMT. SEETHA S., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
2024:KER:81473
2
Bail Appl.No.8405 of 2024
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 02.11.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
2024:KER:81473
3
Bail Appl.No.8405 of 2024
P.G. AJITHKUMAR, J.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Bail Appl.No.8405 of 2024
-----------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2024
ORDER
This is an application for bail filed under Section 483 of
the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
2. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.810 of
2024 of Peramangalam Police Station. He allegedly had
committed an offence punishable under Section 69 of the
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and
the learned Public Prosecutor.
4. The prosecution allegation is that the accused
induced the de facto complainant assuring that he would
marry her and on that pretext at 8.00 p.m. on 01.09.2024 he
had sexual intercourse with her at a lodge at Thrissur. Again
on 17.09.2024 at 10.00 p.m. at a lodge at Amala he
committed a similar offence.
2024:KER:81473
5. The petitioner has been in judicial custody since
27.09.2024. The petitioner would contend that he did not
involve in the alleged crime and without any material or
evidence, he has been implicated in the crime. He is innocent.
The investigation in the matter has been progressed
considerably and there is no reason or justification for his
further detention.
6. The learned Public Prosecutor would submit that
considering the seriousness of the offence and the possibility
of interfering with the investigation by the petitioner in the
event of his release on bail, this petition deserve only to be
dismissed.
7. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor, and considering
the nature and gravity of the offence, further detention of the
petitioner is unnecessary. I am therefore of the view that the
petitioner is entitled to be released on bail.
8. In the result, the bail application is allowed and the
petitioner is granted bail on his/her executing a bond for 2024:KER:81473
Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only), with two solvent
sureties for the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the
learned Magistrate, subject to the following conditions:
(i) He shall not influence or intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence;
(ii) He shall appear before the investigating officer as and when called for; and
(iii) During the bail period, he shall not get involved in any offence.
In case of breach of the bail conditions, the prosecution
shall be at liberty to apply for cancellation of the bail before
the jurisdictional court.
Sd/-
P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JUDGE
dkr 2024:KER:81473
APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 8405/2024
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A1 FREE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 05.10.2024 IN CRL.MP NO. 5029 OF 2024 BY JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, KUNNUMKULAM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!