Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Charitable Educational And Welfare So, ... vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 31039 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 31039 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 November, 2024

Kerala High Court

Charitable Educational And Welfare So, ... vs State Of Kerala on 1 November, 2024

Author: P Gopinath

Bench: P Gopinath

                                               2024:KER:81510
WP(C) Nos.30886/2024, 31114/2024
                             1

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                          PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
 FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 / 10TH KARTHIKA, 1946
                  WP(C) NO. 30886 OF 2024

PETITIONER:

         MOUNT ZION MEDICAL COLLEGE,
         CHAYALODE P.O., ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT,
         PIN - 680596

         BY ADV JESTIN MATHEW
RESPONDENTS:

    1    STATE OF KERALA,
         REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
         REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
         THIRUVANATHAPURAM, PIN - 695035

    2    DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
         PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE,
         PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689645

    3    TAHSILDAR,
         ADOOR, TALUK OFFICE, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA
         DISTRICT, PIN - 691523

    4    DEPUTY TAHSILDAR,
         KOZHENCHERRY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689645

    5    VILLAGE OFFICER,
         ENADIMANGALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK,
         PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 691524

    6    VILLAGE OFFICER,
         KOZHENCHERRY VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK,
         PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689641
                                                    2024:KER:81510
WP(C) Nos.30886/2024, 31114/2024
                                2




            SMT. THUSHARA JAMES (SR GP)


     THIS    WRIT   PETITION   (CIVIL)    HAVING   COME   UP   FOR
ADMISSION ON 01.11.2024, ALONG WITH WP(C).31114/2024, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                     2024:KER:81510
WP(C) Nos.30886/2024, 31114/2024
                                   3


            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
             THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
 FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 / 10TH KARTHIKA, 1946
                     WP(C) NO. 31114 OF 2024

PETITIONER:

            CHARITABLE EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SO, CIETY,
            KOZHENCHERRY PO, KADAMMANITTA, PATHANAMTHITTA
            DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, K.J.
            ABRAHAM, PIN - 689649

            BY ADV JESTIN MATHEW
RESPONDENTS:

    1       STATE OF KERALA,
            REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
            REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
            THIRUVANATHAPURAM, PIN - 695035

    2       DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
            PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 689645

    3       TAHSILDAR,
            TALUK OFFICE, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN
            - 691523

    4       VILLAGE OFFICER,
            ENADIMANGALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK,
            PATHANAMTHITTA, KERALA, PIN - 691524

            SMT. THUSHARA JAMES (SR GP)

     THIS     WRIT   PETITION    (CIVIL)   HAVING   COME   UP   FOR
ADMISSION ON 01.11.2024, ALONG WITH WP(C).30886/2024, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                               2024:KER:81510
WP(C) Nos.30886/2024, 31114/2024
                             4


                       JUDGMENT

These writ petitions have been filed challenging

orders issued by the Assessing Authority under the Kerala

Building Tax Act, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1975

Act') determining building tax payable under the said Act in

respect of certain buildings belonging to the petitioners in

these cases.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the

petitioners in both cases would submit that the assessment

is without application of mind. It is submitted that the

petitioner is entitled to an exemption from payment of

building tax in terms of the provisions contained in section

3(1)(b) of the 1975 Act. It is submitted that in respect of

buildings referred to in section 3(1)(b) of the 1975 Act the

provisions of the 1975 Act will not apply and therefore the

petitioner may be permitted to challenge the assessment

order directly before this Court by filing a writ petition 2024:KER:81510 WP(C) Nos.30886/2024, 31114/2024

under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

3. The learned Senior Government Pleader

submits on instructions that in both these cases the

petitioners filed their returns before the Assessing

Authority under the 1975 Act and did not even raise any

claim for exemption under the provision of section 3(1)(b) of

the 1975 Act. It is submitted that the claim for exemption is

for the first time raised before this Court in this writ

petition and there is no ground made out to interfere with

the order of assessment bypassing the alternate remedy of

appeal under the provisions of section 11 of the 1975 Act.

It is submitted that the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.30886 of

2024 even paid 3 of the installments and thereafter

approached this Court by filing the writ petition. It is

submitted that going by the full bench judgment of this

Court in Aswirathul Musthaqeem Sangham v. State of

Kerala; 2018 SCC OnLine Ker 22415 a claim under 2024:KER:81510 WP(C) Nos.30886/2024, 31114/2024

section 3(1)(b) of the 1975 Act can be raised even at the

appellate stage and if the petitioner were to raise such

claim the Appellate Authority will consider the matter as

contemplated by the provisions of section 3(2) of the 1975

Act, if necessary by referring the matter to the Government

for its consideration.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner

would submit in reply that going by the judgment of the

Supreme Court in State of Kerala v. Mother Superior

Adoration Convent; (2021) 5 SCC 602 where buildings

are principally connected with the purpose for which an

exemption is granted under the provisions of section 3(1)(b)

of the Act, such buildings will also be exempt from the levy

of Building Tax. Particular reference is made to the findings

of the Supreme Court in Paragraph 15 of the aforesaid

judgment where it was held:

"15. A reading of the provision would show that 2024:KER:81510 WP(C) Nos.30886/2024, 31114/2024

the object for exempting buildings which are used principally for religious, charitable or educational purposes would be for core religious, charitable or educational activity as well as purposes directly connected with religious activity. One example will suffice to show the difference between a purpose that is directly connected with religious or educational activity and a purpose which is only indirectly connected with such activity. Take a case where, unlike the facts in Civil Appeal No. 202 of 2012, nuns are not residing in a building next to a convent so that they may walk over to the convent for religious instruction. Take a case where the neighbouring building to the convent is let out on rent to any member of the public, and the rent is then utilised only for core religious activity. Can it be said that the letting out at market rent would be connected with religious activity because the rental that is received is ploughed back only into religious activity? Letting out a building for a commercial purpose would lose any rational connection with religious activity. The indirect connection with religious activity being the profits which are ploughed back into religious 2024:KER:81510 WP(C) Nos.30886/2024, 31114/2024

activity would obviously not suffice to exempt such a building. But if on the other hand, nuns are living in a neighbouring building to a convent only so that they may receive religious instruction there, or if students are living in a hostel close to the school or college in which they are imparted instruction, it is obvious that the purpose of such residence is not to earn profit but residence that is integrally connected with religious or educational activity."

He further contended that in an almost identical case the

Government had by the order marked as Ext.P6 in W.P.

(C).No.31114 of 2024 granted exemption from the payment

of building tax.

5. Having heard the learned counsel for the

petitioners and the learned Senior Government Pleader, I

am of the view that the learned Senior Government Pleader

is right in contending that if the petitioners have a claim

that they are entitled to exemption under section 3(1)(b) of 2024:KER:81510 WP(C) Nos.30886/2024, 31114/2024

the 1975 Act it is for them to raise that contention. It is

admitted before me that such contentions was never raised

before the Assessing Authority and going by the full bench

judgment of this Court in Aswirathul Musthaqeem

Sangham (supra) the claim for such exemption can be

raised even before the Appellate Authority. Therefore, I am

not inclined to consider the contentions taken by the

learned counsel for the petitioners that the buildings in

question or entitled to an exemption of section 3(1)(b) of the

1975 Act, taking into account of the fact that no such claim

for exemption was raised before the original authority.

Accordingly, these writ petitions are disposed of

permitting the petitioners to file statutory appeals under

section 11 of the 1975 Act before the First Appellate

Authority also raising a claim that the buildings in question

are entitled to an exemption under the provisions of section

3(1)(b) of the 1975 Act. If such appeals are filed within a 2024:KER:81510 WP(C) Nos.30886/2024, 31114/2024

period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified

copy of this judgment, such appeals shall be treated as

appeals filed in time. If the petitioners raise a claim for

exemption of section 3(1)(b) of the 1975 Act before the

Appellate Authority such claim shall also be considered by

the Appellate Authority in accordance with the law and also

keeping in mind the provisions of sub-section (2) of section

3 of the the 1975 Act. It is made clear that if the

petitioners pay the first of the installments granted by the

Assessing Authority, the recovery of the balance amount

shall be kept in abeyance pending disposal of the appeals to

be filed by the petitioners before the First Appellate

Authority. All questions of law raised are left open to be

considered/urged before the First Appellate Authority.

GOPINATH P. JUDGE GBG 2024:KER:81510 WP(C) Nos.30886/2024, 31114/2024

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 31114/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF PERMISSION DATED 18/07/2014 BEARING NO. U.12012/781/2014-ME (P – II) ISSUED BY THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RENEWED APPROVAL ISSUED BY INDIAN NURSING COUNCIL IN FILE NO: 18- 16/8501 DATED 13/10/2023

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE INDIAN PHARMACY COUNCIL IN THE REF NO. 32- 1153/2014-PCI DATED 30/07/2015

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE BEARING NO.

B1/420975/2023 DATED 20/06/2024 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY LETTER BEARING NO.

CEWS/MZMC/REF-2/2024 DATED 30/07/2024 SUBMITTED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF CHARITABLE EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY

Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. 3796/2022/RD DATED 14/09/2022 THE 1ST RESPONDENT 2024:KER:81510 WP(C) Nos.30886/2024, 31114/2024

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 30886/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF PERMISSION DATED 18/07/2014 BEARING NO. U.12012/781/2014-ME (P - II) ISSUED BY THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF ASSESSMENT BEARING NO. B1/142841 - 220488/2022 DATED 25/05/2023 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE BEARING NO.

RRC NO. 2024/6237/03 DATED 03/07/2024 ISSUED BY 4TH RESPONDENT

Exhibit P3(a) TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE BEFORE AUCTION NOTICE BEARING NO. RRC NO.

2024/6237/03 DATED 03/07/2024 ISSUED BY 4TH RESPONDENT

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY LETTER BEARING NO.

CEWS/MZMC/REV-1/2023 DATED 30/07/2024 SUBMITTED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF MOUNT ZION MEDICAL COLLEGE

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY LETTER NO. MZMC/REF-

3/2024 DATED 12/07/2024 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT

Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT OF THE PETITIONER FROM THE PERIOD ON 03/11/2023 IN DHANLAXMI BANK

Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT OF THE PETITIONER FROM THE PERIOD ON 30/01/2024 IN DHANLAXMI BANK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter