Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Farzin Ahammed K vs Federal Bank, Palarivattom Branch ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 14561 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 14561 Ker
Judgement Date : 31 May, 2024

Kerala High Court

Farzin Ahammed K vs Federal Bank, Palarivattom Branch ... on 31 May, 2024

Author: T.R.Ravi

Bench: T.R.Ravi

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
                 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
        FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2024 / 10TH JYAISHTA, 1946
                       WP(C) NO. 12633 OF 2024
PETITIONER:

            FARZIN AHAMMED K
            AGED 27 YEARS
            KARUTHEDATH KUTTICHIRA HEAD POST OFFICE
            KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673001

            BY ADVS.
            IPSITA OJAL
            MANAS P HAMEED
RESPONDENTS:

    1       FEDERAL BANK, PALARIVATTOM BRANCH (REPRESENTED THROUGH
            BRANCH MANAGER)
            NO 35/37A, MAIN ROAD, NEAR METRO PILLAR 529,
            PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682025
    2       OFFICER IN CHARGE DCRB MALAPPURAM
            THE DISTRICT CRIME RECORDS BUREAU, MALAPPUARAM
            PALAKKAD - KOZHIKODE HWY, UP HILL,
            MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676505
    3       THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
            ITIATHOK POLICE STATION GONDA
            UTTAR PRADESH, PIN - 271202
    4       OFFICER IN CHARGE, CYBER HELPLINE MUMBAI
            CYBER CRIME, CYBER CID MUMBAI CYBER CRIME,
            CYBER CID MUMBAI FIRST FLOOR, BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX RD,
            OPPOSITE ICICI BANK, G BLOCK BKC, BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX,
            BANDRA EAST, MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA, PIN - 400051
    5       THE ADDITIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, HYDERABAD CITY
            CENTRAL CRIME STATION BUILDING, OLD COMMISSIONER
            OFFICE, BASEERBAGH, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA, PIN - 500029


            SRI. MOHAN JACOB GEORGE, SC.


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
31.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 12633 OF 2024
                                           2




                               T.R.RAVI.J
            -------------------------------------------------------
                       WP(C) No.12633 of 2024
          --------------------------------------------------------
               Dated this the 31st day of May, 2024

                                   JUDGMENT

The petitioner is holder of an account with the respondents

Bank and his account has been frozen on intimation by Police

Authorities. The Court had, at the time of admission, issued

interim directions to restrict the freezing of the accounts to the

amount which had been subject matter of the dispute, as per the

intimation received from the Police authorities. The Bank has

also taken action to that extent pursuant to the directions issued

by this Court. In similar cases, this Court had after issuance of

such interlocutory orders, closed the writ petitions with certain

directions. Paragraph No.12 of the directions issued in Dr.Sajeer

v. Reserve Bank of India [ 2023 KHC OnLine 661] is extracted

hereunder;

"12. In fact, should the criminal enquiry found otherwise, it will be doubtful if the amounts in question could be even recovered WP(C) NO. 12633 OF 2024

from the petitioners, if they have received it as part of bonafide or other valid transactions, unaware of it being proceeds of crime.

In the conspectus of the above, I order these Writ Petitions with the following directions:

a. The respondent Banks arrayed in these cases, are directed to confine the order of freeze against the accounts of the respective petitioners, only to the extent of the amounts mentioned in the order/requisition issued to them by the Police Authorities. This shall be done forthwith, so as to enable the petitioners to deal with their accounts, and transact therein, beyond that limit.

b. The respondent - Police Authorities concerned are hereby directed to inform the respective Banks as to whether freezing of accounts of the petitioners in these Writ Petitions will require to be continued even in the afore manner; and if so, for what further time, within a period of eight months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

c. On the Banks receiving the afore information/intimation from the Police Authorities, they will adhere with it and complete necessary action - either continuing the freeze for such period as mentioned therein; or withdrawing it, as the case may be.

d. If, however, no information or intimation is received by their Banks in terms of directions (b) above, the petitioners or such among them, will be at full liberty to approach this Court again; for which purpose, all their contentions in these Writ Petitions are left open and reserved to them, to impel in future."

This writ petition is disposed of with the above said directions.

Sd/-

T.R.RAVI

JUDGE sn WP(C) NO. 12633 OF 2024

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 12633/2024

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE BANK STATEMENT OF THE PETITIONER Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION MENTIONING THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT NUMBERS ISSUED BY R2 TO R5.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter