Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 14178 Ker
Judgement Date : 29 May, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS
Wednesday, the 29th day of May 2024 / 8th Jyaishta, 1946
IA.NO.1/2024 IN OP (FC) NO. 655 OF 2021(R)
OPGW 401/2018 OF FAMILY COURT, THIRUVALLA
APPLICANT/PETITIONER:
VARGHESE MATHEW, AGED 41, S/O. M.V.MATHEW, NO.5-377,
TOP HILL TEA FACTORY, AMMAN NAGAR, KIL-KOTAGIRI BAZAR P.O.,
NILGRIS, TAMIL NADU STATE, PIN - 643 216.
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
SHARON MANALOOR, AGED 36, W/O.VARGHESE MATHEW AND
D/O.REVI MANALOOR, MANALOOR HOUSE, CHIRAYIRAMBU P.O.,
MARAMON, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 689 549.
Application praying that in the circumstances stated in the
affidavit filed therewith the High Court be pleased to pass and order
permitting the petitioner/father to contact the minor child 'Niah Mary
Varghese' through Whatsapp video call (a) 5 minutes every day except
Friday, Saturday and Sunday between 4.00 P.M and 4.30 P.M (b) 5 minutes
every day except Friday, Saturday and Sunday between 8.00 P.M and 8.30
P.M (c) for 20 minutes Whatsapp video call on every Sunday and Friday
between 8.30 P.M and 9.00 P.M.
This Application again coming on for orders upon perusing the
application and the affidavit filed in support thereof, this Court's
judgment dated 12/01/2022 & order dated 05/04/2024 in IA 1/2024 and upon
hearing the arguments of M/S. JOSEPH GEORGE & P.A.REJIMON, Advocates for
the applicant in IA/petitioner in OP(FC) and of SMT. MEREENA.J.JOSEPH,
Advocate for the respondent in IA/OP(FC), the court passed the
following:
P.T.O.
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & SOPHY THOMAS, JJ.
----------------------------------------------------
I.A No.1 of 2024
in
O.P. (FC) No.655 of 2021
------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 29th day of May, 2024
ORDER
A.Muhamed Mustaque, J.
This is an application filed to modify the conditions imposed in
the compromise to contact the child.
2. The learned counsel for the respondent opposed the
application.
3. The Condition No.h in the compromise is to allow the
father of the child to contact the child through zoom or skype. The
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is very difficult to
contact the child through zoom or skype.
4. Though we are not interested in the argument, we are
of the view that on every Sunday, as mentioned in the compromise,
the father the shall be permitted to contact the child through
Whatsapp and all other conditions will remain intact.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE
Sd/-
SOPHY THOMAS, JUDGE PR
29-05-2024 /True Copy/ Deputy Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!