Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Naufal Basheer vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 13982 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 13982 Ker
Judgement Date : 28 May, 2024

Kerala High Court

Naufal Basheer vs State Of Kerala on 28 May, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                           PRESENT
    THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 7TH JYAISHTA, 1946
                 CRL.MC NO. 2657 OF 2024
CRIME NO.69/2014 OF MANJESWAR POLICE STATION, KASARGOD
 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN SC NO.923 OF 2014
 OF DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS & MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS
                     TRIBUNAL, KASARAGOD
             ...............................
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3:

         NAUFAL BASHEER, AGED 29 YEARS
         S/O ABDULLA BASHEER, RESIDING AT KAYARKATTE
         HOUSE, PAIVALIKE, KASARAGOD DISTRICT, PIN -
         671 348.
         BY ADVS.
         P.V.ANOOP
         PHIJO PRADEESH PHILIP
         ANJU R S.
         K C MOHAMED RASHID
         BIJITHA B. BOSE
         ABIN BENNY


RESPONDENT/STATE :

   1     STATE OF KERALA
         REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
         HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682 031.
   2     STATION HOUSE OFFICER
         MANJESHWAR POLICE STATION,
         KASARAGOD, PIN - 671 323.



         SRI. NOUSHAD K. A. (PP)


THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 28.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC 2657/2024

                                               2




                            BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
                      ......................................................
                               Crl.M.C.No.2657 of 2024
                        ...................................................
                      Dated this the 28th day of May, 2024


                                           ORDER

Petitioner was the 15th accused in S.C.No.460/2014 on the files of the

Sessions Court, Kasaragod, arising out of Crime No.69/2014 of

Manjeshwar Police Station. During the trial of the Sessions Case,

petitioner absconded and therefore the case against him and few other

was split up and renumbered as S.C.No.923/2014 on the files of the

Sessions Court, Kasaragod. In the meantime, the trial in

S.C.No.460/2014 concluded and the accused were acquitted by

judgment dated 30.09.2023. Petitioner seeks the benefit of acquittal of

the co-accused.

2. I have heard Sri.P.V.Anoop, the learned counsel for the petitioner as

well as Sri.Noushad K.A., the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. The prosecution alleged that on 25.01.2014, the accused had, due to

an enmity with the deceased for having given protection to three

persons, formed themselves into an unlawful assembly and committed

murder of Mr.Balige Azeez, while he was travelling in his car by

hitting him with an iron pipe and knife and thereby committed the

offences including Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

4. A perusal of the judgment of acquittal of the accused, who were tried,

reveals that the prosecution had failed to prove the commission of

offences by the accused beyond reasonable doubt. The conclusion

arrived at in the said judgment is based upon the nature of the

evidence that was adduced against the petitioners who were facing

trial. The said conclusion cannot be extended to the petitioner,

especially since the evidence adduced was only in respect of those

accused who were facing trial.

5. Apart from the above, the nature of offences alleged against the

petitioner includes Section 302 IPC. The nature of findings arrived at

by the trial court against those who were acquitted in the trial are not

those that can be extended to the petitioner, to quash the proceedings.

Criminal proceedings can be quashed on the basis of acquittal of the

co-accused only if the substratum of the prosecution case is destroyed

as against the person who claims the benefit on the basis of such

acquittal.

6. Taking note of the nature of offences alleged against the petitioner and

also the findings arrived at by the trial court against those accused

who have been acquitted, this Court is of the view that this is not a

fit case where the substratum of the prosecution case can be said to

have been destroyed by virtue of the acquittal of the co-accused.

Hence, I find no merit in this Crl.M.C. and it is dismissed.

sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AMV/01/06/2024

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.69 OF 2014 OF MANJESHWAR POLICE STATION BY THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF KUMBLA, DATED 24.04.2014.

ANNEXURE B CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN SC NO.460 OF 2014 ON THE FILES OF DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, KASARAGOD DATED 30.09.2023.

TRUE COPY

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter