Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Arifa Nizar vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 13904 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 13904 Ker
Judgement Date : 28 May, 2024

Kerala High Court

Arifa Nizar vs State Of Kerala on 28 May, 2024

Author: A. Muhamed Mustaque

Bench: A.Muhamed Mustaque

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                              PRESENT
         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
                                 &
                 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANU
    TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 7TH JYAISHTA, 1946
                      WP(CRL.) NO.408 OF 2024
PETITIONER :-

          ARIFA NIZAR, AGED 38 YEARS
          W/O.NIZAR, PAMPUTHOOKKIMAKKAL HOUSE,
          KUMBAMKALLU KARA, KARIKKODE,
          THODUPUZHA EAST, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN - 685 585

          BY ADV AJEESH M UMMER


RESPONDENTS :-

    1     STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
          HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001

    2     THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR & DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
          IDUKKI, PIN - 685 603

    3     THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
          THODUPUZHA POLICE STATION, THODUPUZHA, PIN - 688 584

    4     THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF
          IDUKKI, PIN - 685 602

    5     THE CHAIRMAN
          ADVISORY BOARD, KAAPA, SREENIVAS,
          PADAM ROAD, VIVEKANANDA NAGAR, ELAMAKKARA,
          ERNAKULAM DIST., PIN - 682 026

    6     THE SUPERINTENDENT OF JAIL
          CENTRAL JAIL, KANNUR, PIN - 670 004

          BY ADVS.
          SRI.K A ANAS, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
28.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(CRL.) NO.408 OF 2024

                               -: 2 :-




                            JUDGMENT

Dated this the 28th day of May, 2024

A. Muhamed Mustaque, J.

The petitioner is the wife of the detenu. The detenu suffered a

detention order and undergone detention for a period of six months.

Thereafter, a crime was registered against him by the Pothanikad

Police on 31.05.2023 as Crime No.256/2023. The offences registered

against him are under Sections 457, 461, 380 and 201 r/w Section 34

IPC. The detenu is suspected to be involved in this crime along with

another. It is to be noted that the main allegation by the prosecution

is the commission of offence of theft. However, the detenu was not

apprehended from the scene nor there was any witness or any overt

act attributed against the detenu. Based on the circumstantial

evidence, it appears that the detenu was apprehended. Thereafter,

he was released on 13.09.2023. The detention order was passed on

21.10.2023, apparently after the release from the judicial custody.

No doubt, if a person who suffered a detention order repeats offence,

nothing prevents the Authority invoking the provisions of KAA(P) Act

to detain him again for a maximum period of one year. WP(CRL.) NO.408 OF 2024

2. Even in this, we find that there was no application of

mind while considering the nature of offences committed by the

detenu. On a mere registration of a crime, a person cannot be

detained unless his overt act is explicit in such commission of

offence so as to suspect that his act would affect the public order.

We do not find any overt act attributed against the detenu in this

case. In such circumstances, on a solitary incident, the provisions

under the KAA(P) Act cannot be invoked against such person.

Further, we note that more than four months elapsed after the

registration of the crime. Delay was not explained. We also note

that he has already suffered seven months' detention. It is to be

noted that the statutory provision provides a maximum period of one

year. There should be application of mind while considering the

nature of offence committed by the detenu and its impact on the

society to order maximum period of detention. Absolutely, there was

no application of mind while ordering the maximum period of

detention.

3. Taking note of the facts and circumstances, we are of the

view that this is a fit case to set aside the impugned order.

Accordingly, we set aside the impugned order. The detenu shall be WP(CRL.) NO.408 OF 2024

released forthwith, provided, if he is not otherwise required in any

other case under law.

This W.P.(Crl.) is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE

Sd/-

S. MANU JUDGE

Jvt/28.5.2023 WP(CRL.) NO.408 OF 2024

APPENDIX OF WP(CRL.) 408/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS :-

Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO DCIDK/5936/2023-E5 DATED 21.10.2023 ALONG WITH DOCUMENTS RECEIVED AS SUCH Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(RT)NO.3819/2023/HOME DATED 27-12-2023

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter