Friday, 05, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Reji Shamnad vs Kiran Gopi
2024 Latest Caselaw 18903 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 18903 Ker
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2024

Kerala High Court

Reji Shamnad vs Kiran Gopi on 28 June, 2024

Author: T.R.Ravi

Bench: T.R.Ravi

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                       PRESENT
                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
       FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 7TH ASHADHA, 1946
                         CON.CASE(C) NO. 1484 OF 2024
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 20.05.2024 IN WP(C) NO.13674 OF 2024 OF
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

             REJI SHAMNAD
             AGED 43 YEARS
             W/O. SHAMNAD, S.M HOUSE, MUKKUNNAM,
             KADAKKAL, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691 536

             BY ADV SREERAJ M.D.


RESPONDENT:

             KIRAN GOPI
             (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)
             AUTHORIZED OFFICER, FEDERAL BANK, KST MAGGS, MARKET
             JUNCTION, KADAKKAL, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691 536



             SRI. MOHAN JACOB GEORGE, SC.


     THIS     CONTEMPT    OF   COURT    CASE     (CIVIL)   HAVING   COME   UP   FOR
ADMISSION ON 28.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 CON.CASE(C) NO. 1484 OF 2024
IN WP(C) NO.13674 OF 2024
                                        2

                                 T.R.RAVI.J
              -------------------------------------------------------
                Contempt Case (C) No.1484 of 2024 in
                         WP(C) No.13674 of 2024
             --------------------------------------------------------
                 Dated this the 28th day of June, 2024
                                  JUDGMENT

The contempt case has been filed for non compliance of the

direction issued in the judgment dated 20.05.2024. The respondent

submits that this was a case where the amount was not mentioned

and hence compliance with the direction is impossible since the

judgment proceeds on the basis that the amount has been

specifically mentioned. I find justification in the contention of the

respondent.

In the above circumstances, the judgment dated 20.05.2024

is suo motu withdrawn and the writ petition is disposed of with

another judgment even dated with appropriate directions.

Sd/-

T.R.RAVI

JUDGE sn CON.CASE(C) NO. 1484 OF 2024 IN WP(C) NO.13674 OF 2024

APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 1484/2024

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A1 CERTIFIED COPY JUDGMENT DT.20-05-2024 IN W.P.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter