Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17534 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 31ST JYAISHTA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 22248 OF 2024
PETITIONERS:
M/S SPACE 3 INTERIORS
20/283/3, KADAVIL BUILDING, SHORNUR ROAD, THRISSUR, KERALA
REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR,
MR. LINSON GEORGE, SON OF GEORGE,
ALUKKA HOUSE, P.O VETTUKADU, KAINOOR, THRISSUR,
KERALA 680 014,
PIN - 680 022.
BY ADVS.
DHEERAJ KRISHNAN PEROT
VINEETHA A.A.
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE TAX OFFICER
TAXPAYER SERVICES CIRCLE, MANNUTHY STATE GOODS AND
SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KERALA, THRISSUR, KERALA,
PIN - 680 004.
2 ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX THRISSUR
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, TAX COMPLEX,
POOTHOLE, THRISSUR, KERALA,
PIN - 680 004.
3 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
TAX PAYER SERVICES DIVISION, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX
DEPARTMENT, THRISSUR, KERALA,
PIN - 680 005.
BY ADV. RESMITHA R. CHANDRAN (GOVERNMENT PLEADER)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
21.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 22248 OF 2024
: 2 :
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is an assessee under CGST/KSGST
Rules, 2017. The petitioner has filed this writ petition
challenging Ext.P3 order issued under Section 73 (9) of
the CGST/KSGST Act, 2017 by the 1st respondent. The
grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has not
received notice from the 1st respondent before passing an
order under Section 73 (9) of the Act and there is
violation of the principles of natural justice. According
to the petitioner, the shop of the petitioner was closed in
the year 2020 and since the show cause notices were
issued in the address of the shop, the petitioner could
not either respond to the notices or prefer an appeal.
2. In Ext.P3, it is stated that, show cause notice
under Section 73 (1) was issued to the petitioner, but the WP(C) NO. 22248 OF 2024
petitioner did not reply or produced any documents
against the proposal in the notice.
3. According to the petitioner, since the shop was
closed and the notices were sent in the address of the
shop, the petitioner was unaware of the proceedings
before the 1st respondent and could not reply to the
notices. It is for the petitioner to furnish the address for
communication to the Department and if there is change
in address, that has also to be intimated. If the address
to which the communications are to be send is not
updated, the State Tax Officer can sent notices only at
the address provided and complete the adjudication
proceedings. Having not intimated the correct address for
communication, the petitioner cannot complain that there
is violation of the principles of natural justice inasmuch WP(C) NO. 22248 OF 2024
as the petitioner was not served with notice. Therefore,
Ext.P3 cannot be impugned for violation of the principles
of natural justice. I do not find any reason to entertain
the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India.
4. Without prejudice to any other remedy as may
be available to the petitioner in law, this writ petition is
dismissed.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE SRJ WP(C) NO. 22248 OF 2024
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 22248/2024
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE GST CERTIFICATE DATED 17.07.2018.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED 21.03.2024 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 04.06.2024 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!