Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17521 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S.
FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 31ST JYAISHTA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 8309 OF 2018
PETITIONER:
DENNIS SAVIOUR AKKARA,
HIGH SCHOOL TEACHER, SAINT AGUSTIN'S HIGH SCHOOL,
KUTTANELLUR, KUTTANELLUR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.A.S.DHEERAJ
SRI.P.V.JEEVESH
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2 THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS
JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695014.
3 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION THRISSUR
AYYANTHOL, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680003.
4 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT-A, SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
5 THE UNIVERSITY OF KANNUR
REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, THAVAKKARA, CIVIL STATION P.O.,
KANNUR-670002.
6 THE MANAGER ST.AUGUSTINES HIGH SCHOOL,
KUTTANELLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680014.
7 C.D.OUSEPH
S/O.DEVASY, AGED 54 YEARS, HEAD MASTER, ST.AUGUSTINE'S
HIGH SCHOOL,KUTTANELLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680014.
BY ADVS.
I.V.PRAMOD
SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED
WP(C) NO. 8309 OF 2018 -2-
SRI.M.SASINDRAN, SC, KANNUR UNIVERSITY
SRI.M.SAJJAD
SRI. BINOY DAVIS, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY
HEARD ON 21.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 8309 OF 2018 -3-
JUDGMENT
The present writ petition is filed challenging Ext.P1
approval of the appointment granted to the seventh
respondent as Head Master under the sixth respondent
Management. The petitioner contends that the seventh
respondent is not qualified and on a contrary that the
petitioner was qualified and therefore the action of sixth
respondent in refusing to appoint the petitioner as the
Head Master of sixth respondent school is illegal. In the
writ petition it is not clear as to whether the petitioner
has moved the department authorities against the non-
appointment as Head Master. The approval granted by
the first respondent to the seventh respondent had
worked itself out especially when the seventh respondent
continued in service and retired as the Headmaster.
2. When the writ petition is taken up for
consideration today, the learned counsel for the seventh
respondent submitted that the petitioner was
subsequently appointed as HSST and therefore he is
continuing as such. If that be so, the petitioner cannot
aspire to be appointed as a Head Master under the sixth
respondent school.
3. The writ petition was once disposed of by this
Court by judgment dated 09.11.2018 and the same was
recalled by order dated 31.01.2019 in R.P.No.1077 of
2018 at the instance of the seventh respondent.
The essential dispute being the qualification of the
seventh respondent qua the petitioner for appointment
as headmaster, the decision on the relative merit, need
not be gone into by this court at this point of time
because admittedly the seventh respondent continued in
service as a Head Master and retired from service.
Therefore, the challenge to Ext.P1 is declined. Writ
petition is closed.
Sd/-
EASWARAN S.
VV JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 8309/2018
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17-3-
2017 CONFIRMING THE APPOINTMENT OF 7TH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN ANSWER BY THE RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 20-2-2018.
EXHIBIT P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER, DATED 23- 2-2018, GIVEN BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!