Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ravisankar C K vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 17517 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17517 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2024

Kerala High Court

Ravisankar C K vs State Of Kerala on 21 June, 2024

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                              PRESENT
            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S.
   FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE    2024 / 31ST JYAISHTA, 1946
                    WP(C) NO. 6808 OF 2018
PETITIONER/S:
         SRI. RAVISANKAR C K, AGED 50 YEARS,
         S/O.KRISHNA PILLAI,CHARUVEETILTHEKKATHIL,
         MALLIKAMURI, PANADALAM THEKKEKARA VILLAGE,
         THATTAYIL P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
         BY ADVS. SRI.B.KRISHNA KUMAR
         SRI.A.CHANDRA BABU
         SRI.DINESH THANKAPPAN


RESPONDENT/S:
   1     STATE OF KERALA
         REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,
         GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, STATUE P.O.,
         THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001.
   2     THE SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT,
         SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001.
   3     THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE,
         PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689645
   4     THE PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURE OFFICER,
         MINI CIVIL STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA P.O.,
         PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT 689645
   5     THE AGRICULTURE OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN,
         PANDALAM THEKKEKARA VILLAGE, THATTAYIL P.O.,
         PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT- 689501.
         ADDL. R6 IMPLEADED
   6     SRI. G.BAIJU, BINU BHAVANAM,
         PONGALADI PARANTHAL PO, ADOOR TALUK,
         PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
 W.P.(C) No.6808 of 2018        2


          AS PER ORDER DATED 06.03.2018 IN IA NO.4113/2018
        BY ADV. SRI. NOUSHAD K.A., GOVERNMENT PLEADER




     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 21.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C) No.6808 of 2018            3




                       EASWARAN S. , J.
                     -------------------------
                  W.P. (C) No.6808 of 2018
                -----------------------------------
             Dated this the 21st day of June 2024

                            JUDGMENT

The challenge in the writ petition is with regard to the

constitution of the Local Level Monitoring Committee in the

Pandalam Thekkekkara Panchayath. According to the petitioner

the 3rd respondent, District Collector, has no right to include a

person who is not in the select list prepared by the 4 th respondent.

Therefore a writ of certiorari calling for the records leading to

Ext.P2(a) is sought for.

2. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the 3 rd

respondent, in which, it is stated that the Principal Agricultural

Officer, Pathanamthitta had submitted a Panel of farmers from 50

Panchayaths and 4 Municipalities of Pathanamthitta District as

stipulated in Section 5(2)(iv) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy

Land and Wetland Act for reconstitution of the Local Level

Monitoring Committee. As per the said Act, the role of the District

Collector is to constitute the Committee by selecting three

members from the above panel. The District Collector at

Pathanamthitta had reconstituted the Local Level Monitoring

Committee as per the provisions of the Kerala Conservation of

Paddy Land and Wetland Act on 27.01.2018 by selecting the 1 st

three consecutive members from the above panel and hence

Ext.P2(a) order issued by the District Collector is in accordance

with law.

3. I have heard Sri. Chandrababu, the learned counsel

appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. The learned Government Pleader would point out that as

per Section 6 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and

Wetland Act, the tenure of the non-official members of the

committee is only for a period of three years and the said period

had admittedly expired in the year 2021 and, therefore, the

challenge raised in the writ petition has become infructuous on

that count alone.

5. Admittedly, the tenure of the Local Level Monitoring

Committee has come to an end and no purpose would be served

by adjudicating the rival contentions raised by the parties.

Therefore, the interference to Ext.P2(a) has to be necessarily

declined. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to ventilate

his grievances if the reconstitution of the committee takes place

and the illegality as alleged by the petitioner is perpetuated.

Reserving such liberty challenge against Ext.P2(a) is declined.

The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

EASWARAN S. JUDGE NS

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 6808/2018

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL LIST DATED 09.02.2018 NO.KBPT 22/2017-18 PREPARED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT OBTAINED UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RECONSTITUTION ORDER DATED 27.01.2018, NO.C4- 43601/15(1) PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT EXT.P2(a) TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER RECONSTITUTION OF LLCM WITH RESPECT TO PANDALAM THEKKEKARA PANCHAYATH

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter