Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17506 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 31ST JYAISHTA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 22255 OF 2024
PETITIONER/S:
GREESHMA N V
AGED 36 YEARS
W/O JAYAPRASAD HST(NS), CHALAVARA HSS, CHALAVARA,
PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 679505 (RESIDING AT NHALIVALAPPIL,
NHANGATHIRI, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 679303
BY ADVS.
V.A.MUHAMMED
M.SAJJAD
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT ANNEX II,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
2 THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION,
JAGATHY,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014
3 THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 679101
4 THE MANAGER
CHALAVARA HSS, CHALAVARA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN -
679505
5 THE HEADMASTER
CHALAVARA HSS, CHALAVARA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN -
679505
OTHER PRESENT:
ADV NISHA BOSE-SR GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
21.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.C.No.22255 of 2024
2
JUDGMENT
The approval of the appointment of the petitioner as HST by
transfer from UPST, was denied on the reason that the petitioner was
not having the qualification of K.Tet III as on the date of the
appointment order. However, it was pointed out that the petitioner
had acquired the said qualification subsequently i.e. with effect from
27.11.2023. In such circumstances the petitioner submitted Ext.P9
revision petition which is now pending before the 1 st respondent. The
limited prayer sought by the petitioner is to direct the 1 st respondent
to pass orders on Ext.P8 within a time frame.
After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of directing
the 1st respondent to take up Ext.P8 and to pass appropriate orders
thereon, in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner, the 4 th
respondent-Manager and other affected parties, if any. A decision in
this regard shall be taken, by the 1 st respondent, as expeditiously as
possible, by following the timeline and the priorities contemplated in
G.O.(Ms)No.54/2024/GEDN dated 01.06.2024.
Sd/-
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A JUDGE rpk
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 22255/2024
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P-1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 01.06.2016 Exhibit P-2 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE SERVICE BOOK OF THE PETITIONER Exhibit P-3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 15.07.2021 Exhibit P-4 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE MANAGER ADDRESSING THE DEO, ORRAPPALAM VIDE NO.A-65/2021 DATED 20.07.2021 Exhibit P-5 TRUE COPY OF THE EXAMINATION RESULTS OF THE PETITIONER DATED 27.11.2023 Exhibit P-6 TRUE COPY OF THE ELIGIBILITY CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER DATED 09.04.2024 Exhibit P-7 TRUE COPY OF THE IDENTIFICATION CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER VIDE NO.3 Exhibit P-8 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, OTTAPALAM VIDE NO.B5/715984/2024 DATED 16.05.2024 Exhibit P-9 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT DATED 03.06.2024 Exhibit P-10 TRUE COPY OF THE GEDN-E2/243/2023-G.EDN DATED 16.11.2023
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!