Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17492 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
Friday, the 21st day of June 2024 / 31st Jyaishta, 1946
IA.NO.2/2024 IN WP(C) NO. 12633 OF 2023
APPLICANTS/PETITIONERS:
1. SHINOY O.M., AGED 40 YEARS, S/O. SURENDRAN, REVATHI NIVAS,
KALLIKKUZHUMBIL (H), CHELEMBRA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673634
2. THANKAMANI O.M., AGED 60 YEARS, D/O. LATE VELU, REVATHI NIVAS,
KALLIKKUZHUMBIL (H), CHELEMBRA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673634
EWAPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT
SECRETARIAT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001
2. DIRECTOR, SCHEDULED CASTE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SCHEDULED
CASTE/SCHEDULED TRIBE COMMISSION, AYYANKALI BHAVAN, VELLAYAMBALAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-605036
3. DISTRICT SCHEDULE CASTE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, DISTRICT SCHEDULED
CASTE DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, CIVIL STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,
PIN-676505
4. SECRETARY, CHELEMBRA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, GRAMA PANCHAYATH OFFICE,
CHELEMBRA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673634
Application praying that in the circumstances stated in the
affidavit filed therewith the High Court be pleased to make
correction/clarification in W.P (C) No.12633 of 2023 judgment dated
27.02.2024, in the interest of justice.
This Application coming on for orders upon perusing the application
and the affidavit filed in support thereof, and this Court's Final Order
dated 27-02-2024 and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. SANTHARAM P.,
REKHA ARAVIND & P.G. GOKULNATH, Advocates for the petitioner and of M/S.
PRASHANTH KUMAR G.C., R. SUDHISH, M. MANJU, NIRMAL S. & VEENA HARI,
Advocates for R4 to R6, the court passed the following:
V.G.ARUN, J.
=========================
I.A.No.2 of 2024 in
W.P.(C.).No.12633 of 2023
=========================
Dated this the 21st day of June, 2024
ORDER
Having heard all the learned Counsel for the
parties as well as the Special Government Pleader,
I am of the opinion that, instead of a clarification
petition it would be appropriate for the writ petitioners
to file a review petition.
The clarification petition is hence closed, leaving
it open for the writ petitioners to file a review petition.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN
JUDGE NB/21-6
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!