Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Binumon.P vs South Indian Bank Ltd., Rep. By Its ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 17359 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17359 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2024

Kerala High Court

Binumon.P vs South Indian Bank Ltd., Rep. By Its ... on 21 June, 2024

Author: N.Nagaresh

Bench: N.Nagaresh

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                         PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
 FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 31ST JYAISHTA, 1946
                WP(C) NO. 19862 OF 2024
PETITIONER:

         BINUMON.P
         AGED 49 YEARS, S/O. PADMANABHAN M.,
         M/S. AVANA CHICKEN 2/203-B1
         MOONJELY JUNCTION, WEST CHALAKUDY,
         THRISSUR, PIN - 680 307.

         BY ADV
              E.V.MOLY

RESPONDENT:

         SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD.,
         REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER
         REGIONAL OFFICE, VI/950-C & D, AKP CENTRE,
         CHRIST COLLEGE ROAD, CHRIST NAGAR,
         IRINJALAKKUDA THRISSUR DISTRICT.,
         PIN - 680 215.

         BY ADV
              P.A.AUGUSTINE (AREEKATTEL)

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP        FOR
ADMISSION ON 21.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME        DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C) No.19862 of 2024
                                     2




                             JUDGMENT

Dated this the 21st day of June, 2024

The petitioner is one of the guarantors for the

Cash Credit facility of Rs.350 lakhs in the name of

M/s. Avanna Chickens, which is an entrepreneurship being

operated in the name of petitioner's mother

Smt. Thankamma V.K. since the year 2009. M/s. Avanna

Chickens, is a proprietary concern being operated for sale of

chicken mainly in four Districts in Kerala.

2. As the repayment was regular, an additional

facility of Rs.70,68,000/- was sanctioned during Covid-19

pandemic as ECLGS Loan for 36 monthly instalments

commencing from 08.07.2021. However, after Covid-19

pandemic, the business was facing stress as the amount due

from various creditors in the market could not be collected

and the default occurred.

3. The borrower had so far remitted Rs.1.38 Crores

since the date of issuance of demand notice till the

submission of application for renewal of the account

submitted in October, 2023, as directed by the respondent-

Bank. However, for no good reason the application for

renewal was rejected by the authorities without even issuing

a communication in this regard to the applicant borrower.

The petitioner requires reasonable time by way of installment

to settle the liability, if, the relief sought for renewal /

upgradation is not permitted, contends the petitioner.

4. Standing Counsel entered appearance on behalf

of the respondent and resisted the writ petition. The Standing

Counsel, on behalf of the Bank, submitted that the petitioner

was granted CCOL facility of Rs.3.5 Crores on 25.02.2019.

Subsequently, a ECLGS Loan was also granted for an

amount of Rs.70.68 lakhs in the year 2020. The loan

accounts were soon declared as NPA on 18.02.2022, due to

the failure of the borrower to maintain the loan account.

5. The Bank has therefore forced to issue a notice

under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction

of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act,

2002, on 17.04.2024. The borrower thereafter approached

this Court filing W.P.(C) No.24608 of 2022. This Court

granted the borrower an opportunity to clear the overdue

amount under the Cash Credit facility on or before

20.08.2022. As regards clearing off ECGLS facility, the

borrower was granted time upto 15.09.2022. R.P No.1257 of

2022 was filed by the borrower against Ext.P5 judgment. The

said review petition was dismissed as per Ext.P7 judgment

dated 22.12.2023.

6. Thereafter, the borrower approached the Debts

Recovery Tribunal filing Securitisation Application. The said

Securitisation Application is still pending before the Debts

Recovery Tribunal.

7. The Standing Counsel further pointed out that as

the borrower failed to secure interim order from the Debts

Recovery Tribunal, the borrower filed W.P.(C) No.29083 of

2023. Finally, the borrower sought to withdraw that writ

petition. The said writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

The borrower had also approached the Munsiff's Court,

Chalakudy, filing O.S. No.127 of 2024. When the Munsiff's

Court rejected the application for interim injunction, the

borrower filed C.M.A. No.16 of 2024 before the Sub Court,

Irinjalakuda. The said C.M.A. is pending before the Sub

Court. The outstanding amount payable by the borrower as

on 01.06.2024 is Rs.3,96,94,523/-. In the facts of the case,

the writ petition is not maintainable.

8. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for

the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel representing

the Bank.

9. It is evident from the pleadings that what is

extended to the borrower is only a Cash Credit facility of

Rs.3.5 Crores in the year 2019. A ECLGS loan was also

granted, for an amount of Rs.70.68 lakhs in the year 2020.

The loan accounts were soon declared as NPA within three

years, on 18.02.2022. Securitisation proceedings were

initiated by the Bank which issued notice under Section 13(2)

of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets

and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

10. The pleadings and arguments would indicate that

the borrower had approached this Court multiple times and

also the Debts Recovery Tribunal. The borrower either failed

to obtain interim orders from the Tribunal / Court or failed to

adhere to the conditions in the interim order granted by the

court.

11. When this writ petition came up for admission, this

Court passed an interim order on 05.06.2024 directing that if

the petitioner remits an amount of Rs.30 lakhs within a period

of two weeks and a further amount of Rs.70 lakhs on or

before 27.06.2024, coercive proceedings against the

petitioner shall stand deferred till 29.06.2024. It is conceded

by both sides that the petitioner has not paid any amount

pursuant to the direction of this Court on 05.06.2024. The

petitioner would seek a week's time to pay the amount of

Rs.30 lakhs as directed by this Court.

12. Taking into consideration the afore facts and

circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant any

further discretionary reliefs to the petitioner.

Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH JUDGE AMR

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 19862/2024

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION, ISSUED UNDER KVAT RULES 2005, DATED 24.11.2009 IN THE NAME OF M/S. AVANA CHICKEN REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR.


Exhibit P2            THE TRUE COPY OF THE GST REGISTRATION
                      CERTIFICATE       UNDER      REG.NO.32
                      KJUPT6817FIZR DATED 21.09.2017.

Exhibit P3            THE   TRUE     COPY   OF    THE   UDYAM
                      REGISTRATION      CERTIFICATE     DATED
                      02.11.2022.

Exhibit P4            THE TRUE COPY OF THE SANCTION LETTER

DATED 25.02.2019 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT BANK'S BRANCH AT CHALAKUDY.

Exhibit P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 03.08.2022 IN WPC.NO.24608/2022.

Exhibit P6 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 20.12.2022 IN WPC.NO.38474/2022.

Exhibit P7 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN RPNO.1257/2022 IN WPC.24608/2022 DATED 22.12.2023.

Exhibit P8 THE TRUE COPY OF THE VALUATION CERTIFICATE DATED 01.02.2024.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter