Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Susamma Thomas vs The Kumarakom Service Co-Operative ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 17262 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17262 Ker
Judgement Date : 20 June, 2024

Kerala High Court

Susamma Thomas vs The Kumarakom Service Co-Operative ... on 20 June, 2024

Author: Sathish Ninan

Bench: Sathish Ninan

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                          PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
 THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 30TH JYAISHTA, 1946
                  WP(C) NO. 38676 OF 2017
PETITIONER:

         SUSAMMA THOMAS
         AGED 63 YEARS
         AGED 63 YEARS, W/O. THOMAS VARGHESE,(RETIRED FROM
         KUMARAKOM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTDNO.2288,
         KUMARAKOM)RESIDING AT THUNCHATHU, PONGAMTHANAM
         PO.,VAGATHANAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT PIN-686538
         BY ADVS.
         SRI.M.V.THAMBAN
         SRI.ARUN BOSE
         SRI.B.BIPIN
         SRI.R.REJI
         SMT.THARA THAMBAN


RESPONDENTS:

    1    THE KUMARAKOM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK
         NO.2288, KUMARAKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRIC,REPRESENTED
         BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN-686631
    2    THE PRESIDENT
         THE KUMARAKOM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK
         LTDNO.2288, KUMARAKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT,PIN-
         686538
    3    THE SECRETARY
         THE KUMARAKOM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK
         LTD,NO.2288, KUMARAKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT PIN-
         686538
    4    THE JOINT REGISTRAR GENERAL
         OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR(GENERAL)OF CO-
         OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN-695122
    5    THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR GENERAL
         OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL OF CO-OPERATIVE
         SOCIETIES DEPARTMENT,KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN-
         685603
         BY ADVS.
         SRI.N.K.KARNIS
 WP(C) NO.38676 OF 2016
                                    -: 2 :-


             SRI.KIRAN PETER KURIAKOSE
             SRI.S.SHYAM


OTHER PRESENT:

             SMT. RESMI THOMAS.


       THIS    WRIT      PETITION   (CIVIL)   HAVING   COME   UP    FOR
ADMISSION      ON    20.06.2024,    THE   COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                        Sathish Ninan, J.
                    ----------------------
                    WP(C).No.38676 of 2017
               -------------------------------
            Dated this the 20th day of June, 2024

                                JUDGMENT

Petitioner retired from the 1 st respondent Bank on

31/10/2012, as Secretary. According to the petitioner,

though she was entitled for gratuity amount of

Rs.6,81,930/-, she was paid Rs.3.5 lakhs only. The

balance amount was paid only in the year 2017, after a

delay of 5 years. Claiming interest on the delayed

payment, the petitioner had approached the Joint

Registrar. Though the Joint Registrar, as per Ext.P4,

directed payment of interest on the delayed payment, it

is not paid. It is accordingly that the petitioner has

approached this Court.

2. I have heard Sri.R.Reji, the learned counsel

for the petitioner, Sri.S.Shyam,

WP(C) NO.38676 OF 2017

the learned Counsel for the Society, and also Sri.Bijoy

Chandran, the learned Senior Government Pleader.

3. At the time of retirement, the petitioner was

paid gratuity by calculating the same in terms of the

LIC Policy linked Gratuity Scheme. Payments were so

effected in respect of similarly placed persons also.

One among them had approached this Court in W.P.

(C).No.26854/2011 claiming payment of gratuity in terms

of the Payment of Gratuity Act. This Court, as per

Ext.R3(e) judgment dated 13/02/2017, held that the

employee is entitled for gratuity in terms of the

Gratuity Act. The judgment was passed on 13/02/2017. It

is thereupon that the Society disbursed gratuity to all

its retired employees in terms of the directions in the

said judgment.

4. Pertinently, Ext.R3(e) judgment of this Court

did not grant interest for the delayed payment.

WP(C) NO.38676 OF 2017

Petitioner is also similarly placed. Though the

petitioner had retired on 31/10/2012, till the payment

of further amounts by the Bank in the year 2017, no

dispute or claim was raised by her.

5. The balance amount of gratuity was disbursed

by the Bank without any delay after Ext.R3(e) judgment.

In Ext.R3(e) judgment, this Court declined interest.

Adopting any different view would give way to a slew of

claims. As regards the direction given by the Joint

Registrar in Ext.P4 order, he lacks jurisdiction to pass

such an order.

The writ petition fails and is accordingly

dismissed.

Sd/-

Sathish Ninan, Judge rsr

WP(C) NO.38676 OF 2017

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 38676/2017

PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE PRESIDENT OF THE BANK DT 05.08.2016 EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER INFORMED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE BANK TO THE PETITIONER DATED 20.8.2016 EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES DT 18.08.2017 EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.K.M 2835/2017 ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR DT.27.10.2017 EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE PRESIDENT DT.07.11.2017 EXHIBIT P6: TRUE COPY OF THE REMINDER SUBMITTE DBY THE PETITIONER DT.16.11.2017

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter