Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17164 Ker
Judgement Date : 20 June, 2024
WP(CRL.) NO. 577 OF 2024
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANU
THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 30TH JYAISHTA, 1946
WP(CRL.) NO. 577 OF 2024
PETITIONER/S:
SREEDHANYA
AGED 31 YEARS
W/O BADUSHA, PALLISSERIKKAL, SASTHAMKOTTA, KOLLAM, PIN -
690521
BY ADVS.
M.H.HANIS
P.M.JINIMOL
T.N.LEKSHMI SHANKAR
NANCY MOL P.
ANANDHU P.C.
NEETHU.G.NADH
CIYA E.J.
RESPONDENT/S:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO
GOVERNMENT, HOME AND VIGILANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT
SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR & DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691013
3 THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF
KOLLAM RURAL, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691001
4 THE CHAIRMAN
ADVISORY BOARD, KAAPA, SREENIVAS, PADAM ROAD, VIVEKANANDA
NAGAR, ELAMAKKARA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682026
5 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF JAIL
CENTRAL JAIL, VIYYUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670004
BY ADVS.
ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA
WP(CRL.) NO. 577 OF 2024
2
ADDL.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECUTION(AG-11)
ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(AG-28)
OTHER PRESENT:
K A ANAS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
20.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(CRL.) NO. 577 OF 2024
3
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 20th day of June 2024
A.Muhamed Mustaque, J.
Petitioner is the wife of the detenu. Detenu already
suffered a detention order. After earlier detention order, he is
alleged to have involved in a crime. The incident in the crime
occurred on 02.11.2023 in a Bar. However, the case was
registered only on 09.12.2023 and he was arrested on the
same day. Thereafter he was released on bail. The detention
order was passed on 31.01.2024.
2. Taking note of the incident referred in the crime, we
are of the view that if such a crime is reported very belatedly,
no proceedings should be initiated based on such a crime. The
belated registration of crime itself would show rooms for
suspicion as to the nature of involvement of a person, who is
ordered to be detained. It is not a matter where there was
delay in apprehending a person, who alleged to have
committed crime. It is a matter where the comission of offence
itself reported belatedly. While passing detention order, there
should be an application of mind as to the involvement of the
person ordered to be detained in a crime, and on being WP(CRL.) NO. 577 OF 2024
satisfied that he has actively involved and he would be a threat
to the society, the order of detention can be passed.
3. In a matter like this, when there is a room for doubt
as crime itself was reported belatedly, benefit should be given
to the person against whom proceedings are recommended for
detention.
4. We are of the view that based on the solitary
incident as above, there could not have been any proceedings
under the preventive detention law. These aspects have not
been considered by the detention authority. Therefore, we set
aside the detention order and order to release the detenu
forthwith, provided, he is not otherwise required in any other
case under law.
This W.P.(Crl.) is disposed of as above.
Sd/
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE
sd/ S.MANU JUDGE jm/ WP(CRL.) NO. 577 OF 2024
APPENDIX OF WP(CRL.) 577/2024
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO. DCKLM/16043/2023-M-16 DATED 31.01.2024 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT
Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT ,DATED 15.03.2024
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD EVIDENCING THE RECEIPT OF EXT P2 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!