Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.V.Elias vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 17052 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17052 Ker
Judgement Date : 20 June, 2024

Kerala High Court

K.V.Elias vs State Of Kerala on 20 June, 2024

Author: P Gopinath

Bench: P Gopinath

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
                THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
     THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 30TH JYAISHTA, 1946
                       WP(C) NO. 16613 OF 2013
PETITIONERS:

    1     K.V.ELIAS (EXPIRED)
          AGED 62 YEARS, S/O.VARKEY, KUNNARATH, VALARA P.O.,
          ADIMALY, IDUKKI DISTRICT.

    *2    ADDL P2, ELSY ALIAS
          W/O. (LATE) ALIAS K.V, KUNNARATH, 281/21, VALARA P.O.,
          ADIMALY, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 561.

          *(ADDL P2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 07-02-2024 IN
          IA 1/2024 IN WP(C)16613/2013).

          BY ADVS.
               SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN
               SRI.GEORGE MATHEW
               SRI.DIPU JAMES
               SRI.P.A.ISMAIL
               SRI.M.D.SASIKUMARAN
               SMT.MEDHA B.S.
               SRI.GEORGE K.V.
               SMT.STEPHY K REGI


RESPONDENTS:

    1     STATE OF KERALA
          REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
          GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

    2     THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR IDUKKI CIVIL STATION
          KUYILIMALA, IDUKKI DISTICT - 685 601.

    3     KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,
          REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, VYDHYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 005.

    4     THE PROJECT MANAGER
          KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,
          OFFICE OF THE PROJECT MANAGERM, THOTTIYAR HEP,
          KARIMANAL, THATTEKKANNI P.O.,
          IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 606.
 W.P (C) No.16613/2013                    2


     5       ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
             SUB DIVISION NO.IV, C/O.THE PROJECT MANAGER,
             KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, THEP,
             KARIMANAL - 685 600.

             BY ADVS.
                  NIRMAL S., SC, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY
             BOARD LIMITED.
                  THUSHARA JAMES (SR.GP)




      THIS    WRIT      PETITION   (CIVIL)   HAVING   COME    UP    FOR
ADMISSION     ON   20.06.2024,     THE   COURT   ON   THE    SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P (C) No.16613/2013                     3




                         JUDGMENT

The original writ petitioner, who died during the

course of the proceedings before this Court, had

approached this Court challenging Ext.P5

communication issued by the Assistant Executive

Engineer, Sub Division No.IV, Office of the Project

Manager, KSEB-Thottiyar HEP, Karimanal, through

which the petitioner has been informed that certain

boundary stones placed on the property that was taken

over from the petitioner for the purposes of the Tottiyar

Mini Hydro Electric Project have been removed, and

calling upon the petitioner to cooperate with the survey

for fixing the boundaries again. It is the case of the

petitioner that, though it is stated in Ext.P5 that the

petitioner had been paid an amount of Rs.6,89,420/- as

compensation for the land in question, the petitioner had

never accepted the said compensation and had not

agreed to part with the land on receipt of the said

compensation.

2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for

the Kerala State Electricity Board submits that the

petitioner was in occupation of certain land required for

the purposes of the Hydro Electric Project. It is

submitted that, it was found that while the petitioner

claimed to have Patta in respect of a certain extent of

land, the petitioner was in possession of certain

Government Poramboke, which was taken over by paying

an ex gratia amount of Rs.6,89,420/-. It is submitted that

the petitioner had accepted the amount of Rs.6,89,420/-

and he cannot be heard to contend that he had not

accepted the said amount for handing over the property,

which was illegally in his possession. It is submitted that

in respect of the other land over which the petitioner

claims to have a Patta, the said land has also been

notified for acquisition, and a doubt has arisen regarding

the genuinity of the Patta produced by the petitioner and

the petitioner has produced certain documents before

the Taluk Office, Devikulam, in support of the claim of

the petitioner for having Patta over the land and the

same is under scrutiny. It is submitted that the extent of

land over which the petitioner claims to have Patta is

19.767 cents and the extent of land over which the

petitioner had no Patta and which was taken over after

paying an amount of Rs.6,89,420/- as ex gratia is 33.63

cents. It is submitted that in such circumstances, the

reliefs sought for in the writ petition cannot be granted.

3. Having heard the learned counsel for the

petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel for the Kerala

State Electricity Board and the learned Senior

Government Pleader for the official respondents, I am of

the view that the petitioner has not made out any case

for grant of the reliefs sought for in the writ petition. It

is clear that the extent of land taken over from the

petitioner (33.63 cents) for which ex gratia Rs.6,89,420/-

was paid by the Kerala State Electricity Board was in

respect of land over which the petitioner had no Patta.

The petitioner had received the compensation and

handed over the land to the Kerala State Electricity

Board. He cannot, thereafter, be heard to contend that

Ext.P5 communication, which was issued on the basis

that the boundary stones had been removed and a

further survey was being conducted to identify the land

already taken over from the petitioner by paying the

amount of Rs.6,89,420/- is illegal in any manner. As

regards the land over which the petitioner claims to have

a Patta (19.767 cents), the said land has been notified for

acquisition, and certain enquiries regarding the

genuinity of the Patta are also under scrutiny. I am,

therefore, of the view that the petitioner has no right

whatsoever to prevent the Kerala State Electricity Board

from entering into and surveying the property of 33.63

cents of non-Patta land which was taken over from the

possession of the petitioner after paying an ex gratia

amount of Rs.6,89,420/- . As far as the extent over which

the petitioner claims to have a Patta, the said land has

been notified for acquisition. The claim of the petitioner

to have Patta over the said land has also been

scrutinized.

In that view of the matter, the petitioner is not

entitled to any relief in the writ petition. Writ petition

fails and it is accordingly dismissed.

Sd/-

GOPINATH P. JUDGE

ats

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 16613/2013

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1: TRUE COPY OF PATTA NO.13010 DATED 20/10/1993.

Exhibit P2: TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DTD.

17/09/2011.

Exhibit P3: TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT DATED 05/02/2008.

Exhibit P4: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 05/06/2012 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P5: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 07/03/2013 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P6: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DTD. 18/03/2013

Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF DEATH CERTIFICATED DTD.

13.01.2022 ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR OF BIRTH AND DEATH, ADIMALI GRAMA PANCHAYATH

Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF HEIRSHIP CERTIFICATE NO. G3- 335674/2022 K.DIS. DTD. 20.09.2023 ISSUED TAHASILDAR, DEVIKULAM

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS

Exhibit R3(a): TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 17.9.2007.

Exhibit R3(b): TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 26.11.2009.

Exhibit R3(c): TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 25.6.2005.


Exhibit R3(d): TRUE COPY OF THE VALUATION                  STATEMENT
               PREPARED    BY   THE    VILLAGE              OFFICER,
               MANNAMKANDAM DATED 24.6.2008.





Exhibit R3(e): TRUE COPY OF THE VALUATION STATEMENT PREPARED BY THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, DEVIKULAM, DATED 9.7.2008.

Exhibit R3(f): TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE DISTRICT LEVEL PURCHASE COMMITTEE MEETING DATED A 20.1.2010.

Exhibit R3(g): TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT LETTER DATED 20.1.2010 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER.

Exhibit R3(h): TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT LETTER DATED 20.1.2010 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER.

Exhibit R3(i): TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 11.6.2010.

Exhibit R3(j): TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT EXECUTED BY THE PETITIONER IN FAVOUR OF SRI. VINOD P.PRABHAKAR.


Exhibit R3(k): TRUE COPY OF      THE STATEMENT SHOWING THE
               COMPENSATION      FIXED   BY   THE   REVENUE
               DEPARTMENT.

Exhibit R3(1): TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE           DISTRICT
               COLLECTOR, IDUKKI DATED .05.2010.

Exhibit R3(m):      TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE DISTRICT

LEVEL PURCHASE COMMITTEE DATED 16.1.2013.

Exhibit R3(n): TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 10.6.2013 PUBLISHED IN THE KERALA GAZETTE.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter