Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

G. Balakrishna Pillai vs Chengannur Municipality
2024 Latest Caselaw 16349 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 16349 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 June, 2024

Kerala High Court

G. Balakrishna Pillai vs Chengannur Municipality on 11 June, 2024

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANU
     TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 21ST JYAISHTA, 1946
                        WP(C) NO. 19428 OF 2017
PETITIONER/S:

          G. BALAKRISHNA PILLAI
          AGED 64 YEARS, S/O.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, NOW RESIDING AT
          VELLAPPALLIL HOUSE, KEEZHAVAIPUR,P.O.MALLAPPALLY,
          PATHANAMTHITTA-689587, FROM AYAMCOICKAL HOUSE, EDANAD
          P.O., EDANAD, CHENGANNUR-689123.

          BY ADVS.
          SRI.B.RENJITHKUMAR
          SRI.K.T.SEBASTIAN



RESPONDENT/S:

    1     CHENGANNUR MUNICIPALITY
          MUNICIPAL OFFICE, CHENGANNUR P.O., ALAPPUZHA-689121.

    2     A.SASI
          AGED 61 YEARS
          AGED 61 YEARS, S/O.AYYAPPAN, KURAVANPARAMBIL, KEEZH
          CHERIMEL, CHENGANNUR VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR P.O.,
          ALAPPUZHA-689121.

    3     THANKAMMAL SIVAN
          AGED 59 YEARS
          AGED 59 YEARS, W/O.SIVAN, SANKARAVILASAM, KEEZH
          CHERIMMEL,CHENGANNUR VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR P.O.,
          ALAPPUZHA-689121.

    4     THULASI MURALI
          AGED 42 YEARS
          AGED 42 YEARS, W/O.MURALI, NANGATTUMPURATHU, EDANAD
          P.O., EDANAD, CHENGANNUR-689123.

          BY ADV Haridas V N

          SRI.S.HARIKRISHNAN (SC)


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
11.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 19428 OF 2017
                                   2


                             JUDGMENT

Dated this the 11th day of June 2024

Petitioner sold some of his properties to respondents 2

to 4, who are members of Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes

community for construction of residential buildings under EMS

Housing Scheme implemented by the Ministry of Rural

Development of State of Kerala. The scheme has been

produced by the Municipality as Ext.R1(a). One of the

conditions for identifying suitable land as per the scheme is

that the property should have road access.

2. The case of the petitioner is that the properties sold

by him have road access at the time of sale and later the

adjacent land owners closed the pathway.

3. The Municipality, according to the petitioner, did not

make payment to the beneficiaries under the scheme stating

various reasons including non-availability of road access. The

petitioner thereafter approached the Ombudsman for Local Self

Government Institutions by filing complaint No.910/2016. The

learned Ombudsman dismissed the complaint by Ext.P7 order

dated 5.11.2016. In Ext.P7, the learned Ombudsman discussed WP(C) NO. 19428 OF 2017

the issue involved in detail and disposed the complaint directing

the Municipal Council to resolve the issue by including the

properties in the scheme, if the issue regarding road access to

the properties is resolved. In compliance with the directions

issued by the Ombudsman, the municipal council considered

the issue as evident from Ext.R1(b) produced along with the

counter affidavit filed by the Municipality. A meeting held on

25.05.2017, resolved to release the funds, once road access is

obtained to the properties.

4. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned

Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for

the Municipality made submissions.

5. I have perused the writ petition and also the counter

affidavit as well as documents produced by both sides.

6. It appears that after the decision of the Municipal

Council, reflected in Ext.R1(b), no further developments have

happened in the matter. The learned Counsel for the petitioner

submitted that the beneficiaries have constructed residential

houses in the properties and they are living there.

7. If that be so, I am of the view that it is

appropriate for the Municipality to have a fresh look in the matter WP(C) NO. 19428 OF 2017

and take a decision in continuation of the resolution in Ext.R1(b).

Thererefore, I dispose the writ petition with the following

directions:

1) The Secretary, Chengannur Municipality shall conduct an

inspection and find out whether pathway/road access is at

present available to the properties purchased by the

beneficiaries, arrayed as party respondents, in the writ

petition.

2) If it is found that the pathway/road access is available to

the properties at present, appropriate follow-up action

shall be taken by the Municipality for release of the funds

in accordance with the provisions of the scheme to the

beneficiaries.

3) Rights, if any, of the petitioner to claim the amounts from

the beneficiaries is reserved and appropriate steps can be

taken by the petitioner in case the amounts are due to

him.

4) The inspection as directed above shall be conducted within

a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy

of this judgment with notice to the petitioner and also to

the party respondents.

WP(C) NO. 19428 OF 2017

5) Appropriate decision in the matter, of disbursal of

funds, shall be taken within a further period of four

weeks from the date of inspection and the same shall

be communicated to the petitioner and also to the

party respondents.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

SD/ S.MANU JUDGE jm/ WP(C) NO. 19428 OF 2017

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 19428/2017

RESPONDENT EXHIBITS

Exhibit R1(a) True copy of the relevant pages of G.O (P) No. 207/2009/LSGD dt.7.11.2009 along with appendix

Exhibit R1(b) True copy of the resolution no.1 dt.25.5.2017 of the Municipal Council, Chengannur

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO .1794 OF 2010 DATED 07-08-2010 OF THE CHENGANNUR S.R.O. EXECUTED BY THE PETITIONER IN FAVOUR OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE COMPLAINT NO.910 OF 2016, DATED 26-07-2016.

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO .1793 OF 2010 DATED 07-08-2010 OF THE CHENGANNUR S.R.O. EXECUTED BY THE PETITIONER IN FAVOUR OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN COMPLAINT NO.910 OF 2016 DATED 04-11-2016.

EXHIBIT P7 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER IN COMPLAINT NO.910 OF 2016 DATED 05-11-2016.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REPRESENTATIONS SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4 HEREIN ALONG WITH THE PURCHASERS OF THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES UNDER THE SCHEME BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 13-07-2011.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO .1795 OF 2010 DATED 07-08-2010 OF THE CHENGANNUR S.R.O. EXECUTED BY THE PETITIONER IN FAVOUR OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter