Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15907 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 June, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 16TH JYAISHTA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 19203 OF 2024
PETITIONER:
K. ABDUL HAKKEEM
AGED 46 YEARS
S/O MUHAMMED YOUSAF,
PERUNTHENI THERUVU, PUDUNAGARAM P.O,
PALAKKAD, PIN - 678503
BY ADV G.CHITRA
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE SECRETARY,
REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,
KENATHUPARAMBU, KUNATHURMEDU,
PALAKKAD - 678001
ADDL R2 R.MANIKANDAN
S/O K.A. MENON,
RESIDING AT WEST KARATT HOUSE,
WEST THARA, KOLLENGODE,
PALAKKAD.
PIN-678506
ADDL R3 MADHUSOODHANAN R.
AGED 49 YEARS
S/O. RAMANKUTTY, MATTUKADU HOUSE,
KUZHALMANNAM P.O., PALAKKAD
PIN-678702
ARE IMPLEADED AS ADDL R2 AND ADDL R3 AS PER ORDER
DATED 06.06.2024 IN I.A. NOS.1 AND 2 OF 2024.
WP(C) No.19203 of 2024
2
BY ADVS.
SRI.S. GOPINATHAN, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER
SRI. SAJEEVKUMAR K GOPAL-ADDL R2
SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA-ADDL R3
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 06.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) No.19203 of 2024
3
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 6th day of June, 2024
The petitioner, who is an existing Stage Carriage
Operator, has approached this Court seeking to direct the 1 st
respondent-Secretary Regional Transport Authority to
consider and pass final orders on Ext.P1 application
submitted by the petitioner for modification of the time
schedule in respect of his Stage Carriage bearing registration
No.KL-12C-2948.
2. The petitioner states that as per the existing
timings, the service reaches Koduvayur at 5.10 p.m. and an
unnecessary halt of 7 minutes with passengers at Koduvayur
Bus Stop causes inconvenience to the travelling public and
affects the peaceful operation of the service. Similarly, slight
modification in the departure time of five trips is also essential
in view of the introduction of various services on sectors on
the route, as well as changes in timings with respect to other
services.
3. In view of the above circumstances, the petitioner
submitted an application to make changes in the time
schedule of his service. As per Rule 212 of the Kerala Motor
Vehicles Rules, 1989, the 1st respondent is the authority to
consider Ext.P1 request submitted by the petitioner and to
make necessary changes in the timings of the service. Any
delay in considering the same results impossibility of the
operation of the petitioner's service and will only defeat the
purpose of the submission of the application itself. Hence, the
petitioner is before this Court.
4. Additional respondents 2 and 3 submitted that the
petitioner was already granted a set of timings, which was
challenged by the petitioner before the State Transport
Appellate Tribunal in MVARP No.83/2022 and additional
respondents 2 and 3 are parties therein. When the said issue
is pending consideration, the petitioner cannot aspire for
another set of timings. Unless the petitioner withdraws the writ
petition, the petitioner cannot file a fresh application for
revision of timings.
5. Heard.
6. I am of the view that these are matters which can
be considered by the Secretary himself while deciding the
issue.
The writ petition is therefore disposed of directing the
1st respondent-Secretary, Regional Transport Authority to
consider Ext.P1 application submitted by the petitioner and
take appropriate decision thereon, within a period of two
months in accordance with law, after giving opportunity of
hearing to the petitioner and additional respondents 2 and 3.
Sd/-
N.NAGARESH JUDGE spk
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 19203/2024
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 18.05.2024
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!