Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15731 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 June, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
Thursday, the 6th day of June 2024 / 16th Jyaishta, 1946
CRL.M.APPL.NO.1/2021 IN CRL.A NO.429 OF 2021
SC 883/2016 OF 1ST ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT (SPECIAL COURT), PALAKKAD
APPELLANT/ACCUSED:
RATHEESH R., AGED 23 YEARS,
S/O.RAJAMANI, KUDUMPAPOTTA UPPUTHODE,
ERATTAKULAM, ELAPPULLY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
KASABA POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT,
THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA
(CRIME NO.701/2016, KASABA POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD).
Application praying that in the circumstances stated threrein the
High Court be pleased to suspend the exeution of the sentence and the
appellant may be released on bail till the disposal of the above appeal.
This Application coming on for orders upon perusing the application
and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.VISHNUPRASAD NAIR, Advocate for the
petitioner and of the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the respondent,the court
passed the following:
P.T.O.
P.G. AJITHKUMAR, J.
------------------------------------------------
Crl.M.A.No.1 of 2021
in
Crl.A. No.429 of 2021
---------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 6th day of June, 2024
ORDER
This is a petition filed by the appellant under
Section 389(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
(Code), seeking suspension of execution of sentence. The
petitioner was convicted for the offence punishable under
Section 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and
Section 5(l) r/w 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual
Offences Act, 2012. The term of sentence the petitioner has
to undergo under the impugned judgment is 10 years. The
petitioner seeks to suspend the execution of sentence,
essentially on the ground that he already had undergone
more than 50% of the period of sentence, and that the
likelihood of hearing and disposal of the appeal in a near
future, is unlikely.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and
the learned Public Prosecutor.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would point out
a few circumstances, which are sufficient, in his view, to set
aside the impugned judgment. Having regard to the
submissions on either side and the observations in the
judgment, I am unable to accept the said contentions at this
stage. It is a fact that this appeal, being of the year 2021, is
not able to be heard and decided immediately. When the
petitioner has been in jail since the date of conviction and the
period of detention by now is more than 50% of the sentence
imposed, it is only appropriate to suspend the execution of
sentence subject to conditions in order to safeguard the
interest of the victim.
In the circumstances petition is allowed, subject to
strict conditions. Execution of the sentence is suspended and
bail is granted to the petitioner on his executing a bond for
Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only), with two solvent
sureties for the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the
trial court, subject to the following conditions:
i) He shall deposit 50% of the fine amount within two
months;
ii) He shall not enter the local limits of Kasaba Police
Station, Palakkad till the final disposal of this appeal;
iii) During the bail period, he shall not get involved in
any offence; and
iv) He shall not contact or try to intimidate the victim or
witnesses examined in the case.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the
prosecution shall be at liberty to apply before this Court for
cancellation of the suspension of sentence.
Sd/-
P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JUDGE
SSK/06/06
06-06-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!