Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Muhammed Lukman Hakkim vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 15723 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15723 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 June, 2024

Kerala High Court

Muhammed Lukman Hakkim vs State Of Kerala on 6 June, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
     THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 16TH JYAISHTA, 1946
                     CRL.MC NO. 4301 OF 2024
    CRIME NO.2589/2022 OF Kottarakkara Police Station, Kollam
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.1027 OF 2022 OF JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -I,KOTTARAKKARA
PETITIONER/S/ACCUSED(A1 & 2):

    1     MUHAMMED LUKMAN HAKKIM
          AGED 24 YEARS
          S/O MUHAMMED MUSTHAFA, P K HOUSE, PLAMMOODU, PALLICKAL
          P.O., MYLOM VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA TALUK, KOLLAM
          DISTRICT, PIN - 691566
    2     UMAR MUKTHAR
          AGED 24 YEARS
          S/O SHAJARUDHEEN, KALLUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, PALLICKAL
          P.O., MYLOM VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA TALUK, KOLLAM
          DISTRICT, PIN - 691566
          BY ADVS.
          K.V.ANIL KUMAR
          SWAPNA VIJAYAN
          RADHIKA S.ANIL


RESPONDENT/S/STATE & COMPLAINANT:

    1     STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
          PIN - 682031
    2     THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
          KOTTARAKARA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN -
          691506
    3     SALMAN S
          AGED 19 YEARS
          S/O ABDUL SALIM, BEENA MANZIL, PALLICKAL P.O., MYLOM
          VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN -
          691566
OTHER PRESENT:

          ASHI MC (PUBLIC PROSECUTOR)
 CRL.MC NO. 4301 OF 2024
                                  2

     THIS   CRIMINAL      MISC.   CASE   HAVING   COME   UP   FOR
ADMISSION ON 06.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED
THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 4301 OF 2024
                                          3


                      BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
                  ....................................................
                         Crl.M.C.No.4301 of 2024
                .......................................................
                Dated this the 6th day of June, 2024

                                     ORDER

Petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction under Section

482 Criminal Procedure Code to quash all proceedings against

them.

2. Petitioners are accused Nos. 1 & 2 in C.C. No.

1027/2022 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate

Court-I, Kottarakkara arising out of Crime No. 2589/2022 of

Kottarakkara Police Station, Kollam registered for the offences

under Sections 341 and 323 r/w, section 34 of the Indian Penal

Code, 1860. The 3rd Respondent is the defacto complainant .

3. According to the prosecution, the accused had on

16.11.2022, due to a previous enmity, formed themselves into

an unlawful assembly and assaulted the defacto complainant,

after restraining him and thereby committed the offences

alleged.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the

learned counsel for the respondent, apart from the learned CRL.MC NO. 4301 OF 2024

Public Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that

the matter has been settled and hence the proceedings against the

petitioners ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that,

considering the nature of offences alleged, no purpose would be

served by continuing the proceedings.

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another

[(2012) 10 SCC 303], the Apex Court has held that in

appropriate cases, the High Court can take note of the amicable

resolution of disputes between the defacto complainant and the

wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal proceedings. This view

was reiterated in Narinder Singh and Others v. State of

Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and Yogendra

Yadav and Others v. State of Jharkhand and Another

[(2014) 9 SCC 653].

7. I have perused Annexure C affidavit filed by the 3rd

respondent. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that

upon verification, it is understood that the affidavit is genuine,

and the defacto complainant stands by the contents thereof. I

am satisfied that the matter has been settled and no public

interest is involved in this case. There is no impediment for CRL.MC NO. 4301 OF 2024

granting the prayer for quashing. The continuance of the

proceedings will only be an exercise in futility.

8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioners in

C.C. No. 1027/2022 on the files of the Judicial First Class

Magistrate Court-I, Kottarakkara are quashed.

This Criminal Miscellaneous case is allowed as above.

Sd/-

                                       BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
sngi                                              JUDGE
 CRL.MC NO. 4301 OF 2024




PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure-A          CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR AND FIS IN
                    CRIME NO. 2589 / 2022 OF KOTTARAKARA
                    POLICE STATION DATED 17.11.2022
Annexure-B          CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN
                    CRIME NO. 2589 / 2022 OF KOTTARAKARA
                    POLICE STATION DATED 29.11.2022
Annexure-C          AFFIDAVIT OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED
                    16.05.2024
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter