Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15712 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 June, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 16TH JYAISHTA, 1946
CRL.MC NO. 1914 OF 2024
CRIME NO.748/2016 OF THALAYOLAPARAMBU POLICE STATION,
KOTTAYAM
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.1753 OF 2016
OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,VAIKOM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
1 PRADEEP, AGED 55 YEARS
S/O VAASU, KATTATHARA HOUSE, THALAYOLAPARAMBU
P.O, THALAYOLAPARAMBU KARA, VADAYAR VILLAGE,
VAIKOM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686
605.
2 REJEENA, AGED 51 YEARS
W/O PRADEEP, KATTATHARA HOUSE,
THALAYOLAPARAMBU P.O,
THALAYOLAPARAMBU KARA, VADAYAR VILLAGE,
VAIKOM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686
605.
BY ADV VIDHYA KISHAN
RESPONDENT/STATE/COMPLAINANT/DE FACTO COMPLAINANT :
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,.
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682 031
2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER OF THALAYOLAPARAMBU
POLICE STATION
VAIKOM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686
605.
3 RAJEEV, AGED 53 YEARS
S/O MANI, OLITHADATHIL HOUSE,
THALAYOLAPARAMBU P.O, THALAYOLAPARAMBU KARA,
VADAYAR VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT
NOW RESIDES AT GEM RUBBER INDUSTRIES,
MAMMODU P.O, CHANGANACHERRY,
KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686 605.
BY ADV JITHIN BOSE
RENJITH T./R (PP)
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 06.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
CRL.MC 1914/2024
2
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
......................................................
Crl.M.C.No.1914 of 2024
...................................................
Dated this the 6th day of June, 2024
ORDER
Petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C to
quash all proceedings against them.
2. Petitioners are accused Nos.1 and 2 in C.C.No.1753/2016 on the files
of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Vaikom, arising out of
Crime No.748/2016 of Thalayolaparambu Police Station, registered for
the offences punishable under Sections 294(b) and 323 r/w Section 34
of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The third respondent is the de facto
complainant.
3. According to the prosecution, accused had on 05.06.2016 assaulted the
de facto complainant, after abusing him and thereby committed the
offences alleged.
4. Though this petition has been filed to quash the proceedings, on the
basis of the settlement and an affidavit in support of the contention
has been produced, the learned Public Prosecutor, upon instructions,
submitted that the de facto complainant informed that he is not
willing to settle the complaint.
5. In view of the above submission, the relief sought for by the
petitioner cannot be granted. Accordingly this Crl.M.C.is dismissed
sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AMV/07/06/2024
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT IN CRIME NO. 748 OF 2016 OF THE THALAYOLAPARAMBU POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM ALONG WITH THE STATEMENT OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT
ANNEXURE A2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET IN C.C. NO. 1753 OF 2016 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM.
ANNEXURE A3 THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN TO BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 24.11.2023.
TRUE COPY
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!