Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15431 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 June, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 15TH JYAISHTA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 19845 OF 2024
PETITIONER/S:
1 V.C. SAJU
AGED 50 YEARS
S/O. CHACKO,VARANGALAKKUZHIYIL HOUSE, MUVATTUPUZHA
P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK, ERNAKULAM - 686661 (AADHAAR
CARD NO. 6748 6901 3519), REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF
ATTORNEY HOLDER MRS. SEENA RAJAN, AGED 51 YEARS, W/O.
RAJAN MATHEW, PATAYATTY HOUSE, ANGAMALI P.O., ALUVA
TALUK, ERNAKULAM-683572. (AADHAAR CARD NO. 5949 9763
1709), PIN - 686661
2 MARY CHACKO
AGED 80 YEARS
W/O. LATE CHACKO, VARANGALAKKUZHI HOUSE, MUVATTUPUZHA
P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK, ERNAKULAM (AADHAAR CARD NO.
3422 5323 2023), PIN - 686661
BY ADV JOBY CYRIAC
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN -
682030
2 DEPUTY TAHASILDAR
TALUK OFFICE, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682311
3 THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY AS PER SEC. 7 BANNING OF
UNREGULATED DEPOSITS SCHEMES (BUDS) ACT - SECRETARY
HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, GOVERNMENT
SECRETRIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
4 CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
KALOOR, KOCHI, REP. BY ITS REGIONAL DIRECTOR., PIN -
682017
5 STATION HOUSE OFFICER
MUVATTUPUZHA POLICE STATION, MUVATTUPUZHA P.O., PIN -
686661
W.P (C) No.19845/2024 -2-
6 MARY RANI
POPULAR NIDHI LTD., XIII/526-E, POPULAR TOWER ANNEXURE,
VAKAYAR P.O., KONNI P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689698
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
05.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P (C) No.19845/2024 -3-
JUDGMENT
The petitioners had leased out a building to the 6 th respondent namely
'Mary Rani Popular Nidhi Ltd.' On account of certain proceedings initiated
against the Popular Group of companies under the provisions of the Banning
of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019, the 5 th respondent sealed the
premises. According to the petitioners, the building of the petitioners is not
liable to attachment, as the relationship between the petitioners and the 6 th
respondent was that of lessor and lessee.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that
despite approaching the 1st respondent as also the officials of the Central
Bureau of Investigation (to which agency the investigation of the criminal
cases registered against the Popular Group and its directors has been
transferred), the petitioners are unable to get vacant possession of the
building in question.
3. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, would submit
that there have been similar issues in various districts. It is submitted that
the 3rd respondent has authorized District Collector in each district to take
decisions regarding handing over of premises such as those belonging to the
petitioners. It is submitted that this Court had already considered similar
matters in W.P (C) No.18699/2021 and W.P (C) No. 3600/2021 and the
matter can be considered by the 1 st respondent in the light of the directions
contained in the aforesaid judgments.
4. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 4 th respondent,
would submit that it has to be clearly established that the relationship
between the petitioners and the 6 th respondent is purely that of lessor and
lessee.
5. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners,
learned Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents and the
learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Central Bureau of Investigation,
this writ petition will stand disposed of directing the 1 st respondent to
consider Ext.P4 representation and take a decision in the matter. It is made
clear that if the relationship between the petitioners and the 6 th respondent is
purely that of lessor and lessee, the 1st respondent shall pass necessary orders
directing the handing over the premises in question to the petitioners within a
period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this
judgment. While passing orders, the 1st respondent shall also have due regard
to the judgments of this Court in W.P (C) No. 18699/2021 and W.P (C) No.
3600/2021.
Writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P. JUDGE AMG
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 19845/2024
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT BEARING NO.KL07071201053/2023, DATED 17/02/2023 OF THE PROPERTY, ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICE, MUVATTUPUZHA
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE TITLE DEED WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY VIZ. PARTITION DEED NO.251/1/2023 DATED 20/01/2023 OF THE MUVATTUPUZHA SRO
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF LEASE DEED DATED 02/05/2017 EXECUTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER IN FAVOUR OF THE 6TH RESPONDENT
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SENT BY THE PETITIONERS TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT DATED 29-04-2024 OF REPRESENTATION SENT BY THE PETITIONERS TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT
Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 09/04/2024 IN WPC
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!