Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15294 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 June, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 15TH JYAISHTA, 1946
RP NO. 543 OF 2024
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.12951 OF 2023 OF HIGH
COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN WP(C):
P. GOPALAKRISHNAN PILLAI
AGED 74 YEARS, S/O PARAMESWARAN PILLAI, B-17 UTHRADAM,
S.S.KOVIL LANE, KAWDIAR.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695003
BY ADV P. GOPALAKRISHNAN PILLAI(Party-In-Person)
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS IN WP(C):
1 DISTRICT COLLECTOR
CIVIL STATION, ALAPPUZHA COLLECTORATE P.O.,
ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688 001
2 RDO, CHENGANNUR
O/O THE RDO, CHENGANNUR, CHENGANNUR P.O.,
ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 689 121
3 CHAIRPERSON
LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, MUTHUKULAM GRAMA
PANCHAYATH, MUTHUKULAM P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT,
PIN - 690 506
4 AGRICULTURAL OFFICER
MUTHUKULAM, O/O THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, MUTHUKULAM,
MUTHUKULAM P.O., ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 690 506
5 VILLAGE OFFICER
MUTHUKULAM VILLAGE OFFICE, MUTHUKULAM P.O.,
ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 690 506
BY ADV.
SRI. B.S. SYAMANTAK, GP
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.06.2024,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RP NO.543 OF 2024
2
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
------------------------------------------------
RP No.543 of 2024
--------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 05th day of June, 2024
ORDER
This Review Petition is filed to review the
judgment dated 20.05.2024 in WP(C) No.12951/2023.
2. The review petitioner is mainly aggrieved
because in direction No.1 in the judgment it is stated
that the second respondent is directed to reconsider
the matter after getting KSREC report from the
competent authority. According to the petitioner, in
the light of Ext.P4 judgment KSREC report is not
necessary. I think, there is some force in this RP NO.543 OF 2024
argument. Therefore, the sentence "and also after
getting KSREC report from the competent authority" in
direction No.1 can be deleted.
2. The second ground for review is that the
petitioner also may be given an opportunity of hearing.
That also can be given.
Therefore, this review petition is allowed in the
following manner;
1. The sentence in direction No.1 in the
judgment dated 20.05.2024 in WP(C)
No.12951/2023 to the effect that "and also
after getting KSREC report from the
competent authority" is deleted.
2. While deciding the matter, as directed in RP NO.543 OF 2024
direction No.3 of the judgment, an opportunity
of hearing should be given to the review
petitioner also.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
nvj JUDGE
RP NO.543 OF 2024
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT 20-5-
2024 IN W.P.(C). NO. 12951 OF 2023 ON THE FILES OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
PA TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!