Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15091 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 June, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 14TH JYAISHTA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 12495 OF 2015
PETITIONER:
JOBBY THOMAS THOONATT,
AGED 34 YEARS,
S/O.THOMAS THOONATT,RESIDING AT THOONATT HOUSE,
PAYYAVOOR P.O., KANNUR-670 632.
BY ADV SRI.MAHESH V RAMAKRISHNAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT.&
COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION,
SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-697 001.
2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
KANNUR-670 002.
3 THE LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE,
PAYYAVOOR, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN,
THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI
BHAVAN,PAYYAVOOR,KANNUR DISTRICT-670 632.
4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
PAYYAVOOR VILLAGE,KANNUR DISTRICT-670 632.
SRI. VENUGOPAL V (GP)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 04.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 12495 OF 2015
2
JUDGMENT
This writ petition was filed challenging the inclusion of the
land belonging to the petitioner in the draft data bank as paddy
land and also being aggrieved by Exts.P3 and P5 orders, through
which the petitioner was directed to restore the land to its original
condition.
2. When this matter is taken up for consideration today,
the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
may be permitted to make an application for correcting the entries
in the data bank in terms of the provisions contained in the
proviso to Section 5(4) of the the Kerala Conservation of Paddy
Land and Wetland Act, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 2008
Act').
Having considered the submission made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader and
having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ
petition will stand disposed of permitting the petitioner to make an
application in terms of the proviso to Section 5(4) of the 2008 Act
for correction of entries in the data bank if he has a case that the WP(C) NO. 12495 OF 2015
entries were incorrect in any manner. Exts.P3 and P4 orders
directing the petitioner to restore the land will stand suspended for
the time being to enable the petitioner to move the application as
aforesaid. If it is ultimately found that the land of the petitioner
was correctly classified as paddy land and if the same has been
illegally converted, the petitioner will be liable to comply with
Exts.P3 and P5 orders.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P. JUDGE DK WP(C) NO. 12495 OF 2015
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 12495/2015
PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTERED SALE DEED DATED 14.10.2011 EXECUTED BY SMT.SREELATHA SURESH IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER AND HIS BROTHER.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 23.05.2013 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER AND OTHERS.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 23.11.2013 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE DATA BANK OF PAYYAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH DATED NIL.
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 24.10.2014 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!