Friday, 05, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Biju vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 19327 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19327 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 July, 2024

Kerala High Court

Biju vs State Of Kerala on 3 July, 2024

Author: A.Muhamed Mustaque

Bench: A.Muhamed Mustaque

WP(CRL.) NO. 696 OF 2024
                                    1

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                 PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
                                    &
                    THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANU
         WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JULY 2024 / 12TH ASHADHA, 1946
                        WP(CRL.) NO. 696 OF 2024
PETITIONER/S:

            BIJU
            AGED 48 YEARS
            S/O.CHINNAN, KOLADY HOUSE, MARATHANKODE DESOM,
            CHIRAMANANGAD VILLAGE, THRISSUR, PIN - 680604

            BY ADVS.
            C.A.CHACKO
            C.M.CHARISMA
            BABU V.P.
            VISHNU S. MULLAPPALLY



RESPONDENT/S:

     1      STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001

     2      THE CHAIRMAN
            ADVISORY BOARD, KERALA ANTI SOCIAL ACTIVITIES (PREVENTION)
            ACT, PADOM ROAD, ELAMAKKARA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI, PIN - 682026

     3      THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
            THRISSUR RANGE, THRISSUR, PIN - 680010

     4      THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF
            THRISSUR CITY, THRISSUR, PIN - 680631

            SRI.ANAS (PP)




     THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
03.07.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(CRL.) NO. 696 OF 2024
                                               2



                                       JUDGMENT

Dated this the 3rd day of July 2024

A.Muhamed Mustaque, J.

Challenging an order of externment issued under the

provisions of the Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007

petitioner has approached this Court. The order was passed on

16.04.2024. The period of externment is one year. By the impugned

order, petitioner has been restrained from entering into the Thrissur

Revenue District. It is to be noted that three cases has been

registered against the petitioner by the Kunnamkulam Police station.

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has

been falsely implicated in cases because of the enmity with the

Police Officer. The cases registered by the Kunnamkulam is as

follows:

Sl.No. Crime No. Police Station Offences involved

Under sections

1 922/2019 Kunnamkulam U/s 447,427,506,308 IPC

2 551/2023 Kunnamkulam U/s 354, 354A(1)(i), 354 A(1)(ii), 354 (1)(iv), 354 D, 509 IPC

3 1690/2023 Kunnamkulam U/s 341, 447, 354A(1)(iii)(iv), 354 A (1) (IV), 201 IPC WP(CRL.) NO. 696 OF 2024

3. All these cases has has been registered in the year 2019

and 2023 and the allegation is that petitioner has exhibited his

nudity and abused the defacto complainant.

4. Taking note of the nature of offences committed, petitioner

has been ordered to be restrained from entering into the Thrissur

Revenue District for a period of one year. This was reduced to 11

months by the Advisory Board.

5. While passing an externment order and also placing

restriction, there should be an application of mind as to the nature

of offence committed by the externee. Taking note of the nature of

offences committed, we are sure that the maximum period imposed

by the authority concerned is not proportionate. The purpose of

externment order is to ensure that such offence are not repeated in

the locality, where such an incident have been reported.

6. The nature of allegations as such itself do not indicate

that such a longer period of externment order is required to be

imposed on the petitioner. Petitioner is having a family and a grown

up girl child. We do not know the circumstances under which such

incident had occurred. We cannot recognise the allegation made

against the Police Officer with whom petitioner had issues and

disputes. Petitioner also lodged a complaint before the Magistrate

against the Police Officer.

WP(CRL.) NO. 696 OF 2024

7. Taking note of the facts and circumstances, we are of

the view that the operation of the impugned order can be confined

till 22.07.2024. Thereafter, petitioner shall report before the A.C.P

Office, Kunnamkulam on every sunday at 11 am for a further period

of two months.

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE

sd/ S.MANU JUDGE jm/ WP(CRL.) NO. 696 OF 2024

APPENDIX OF WP(CRL.) 696/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.B3-6350/2024/TSR DATED 3/4/2024 ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.B3-6350/2024/TSR DATED 16/4/2024 ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 31/5/2024 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF MEDICAL REPORT RECEIVED FROM TALUK HEADQUARTERS HOSPITAL, CHAVAKKAD DATED 17/12/2023

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF MEDICAL REPORT RECEIVED FROM GOVT.

MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, THRISSUR DATED 22/12/2023

Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF PETITIONER'S DEPOSITION DATED 2/2/2024 IN CMP.NO.6976/2023

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter