Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bindu Manoj vs The Secretary
2024 Latest Caselaw 5620 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5620 Ker
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2024

Kerala High Court

Bindu Manoj vs The Secretary on 16 February, 2024

Author: V Raja Vijayaraghavan

Bench: V Raja Vijayaraghavan

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                           PRESENT

      THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V

  FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY   2024 / 27TH MAGHA, 1945

                   WP(C) NO. 3272 OF 2024

PETITIONER:

        BINDU MANOJ, AGED 45 YEARS, PALAKKAL HOUSE,
        KANJANY, KANJANY POST, THRISSUR DISTRICT,
        PIN - 680612

        BY ADV RASMI NAIR T.

RESPONDENTS:

  1     THE SECRETARY, MANALUR SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD
        31, P O MANALUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680617

  2     THE ARBITRATOR AND CO OPERATIVE INSPECTOR,
        OFFICE OF THE CO OPERATIVE INSPECTOR, AYYANTHOLE P O,
        THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680003

        BY ADVS.
        SEBY JOSEPH(K/71/1996)
        GISON ALIYAS(K/003942/2023)


        SRI SHIBIN K F, SC FOR MANALUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE
        BANK

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 16.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 w.p.c 3272 of 2024                   2




                                   JUDGMENT

The petitioner asserts that she obtained a loan of Rs. 10 lakhs from

the 1st respondent Bank, with her immovable property mortgaged as

security. However, due to severe financial crises, she was unable to make

timely repayments. As a result, ARC proceedings were initiated, and Ext.P1

summon notice has been served on the petitioner. Given these

circumstances, the petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking permission

to repay the amount through manageable installments.

2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents

submits that the total outstanding as of date due from the petitioner is

about Rs.26,80,097/-. It is submitted that the loan was availed in the year

2017 and that the bank is not averse to granting the petitioner an

opportunity to clear the outstanding. However, he submits that not more

than eight installments be granted.

3. Upon careful consideration of the submissions made by both

parties, it is evident that the petitioner owes in excess of Rs.26.80 lakhs to

the 1st respondent Bank. The respondents, very fairly, have agreed to permit

the petitioner to settle these debts through a limited number of installments.

As a measure of last resort, I am inclined to issue directions to facilitate the

petitioner in discharging her financial obligations to the 1st respondent. This

approach is deemed necessary to provide a structured pathway for the

petitioner to clear off her monetary liabilities in a manageable manner.

Resultantly, this writ petition is ordered, and the following directions

are issued:

(i) The petitioner shall approach the 1st respondent with a request to inform her of the details of the outstanding amount together with interest and other charges due from her in respect of the loan account. If such a request is made within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, the 1st respondent shall forthwith issue a statement in writing detailing the amounts.

(ii) On receipt of such a statement, the petitioner shall pay the amounts shown therein in twelve (12) equal monthly installments commencing from 15.3.2024 and continue to pay the same on every successive month thereafter until the entire loan is wiped off.

(iii) If the amounts are diligently paid in terms of the directions above, coercive proceedings initiated against her by the respondents for the realization of the amount shall be kept in

abeyance.

(iv) It is made clear that if the petitioner commits default of any two installments, she will lose the benefit of this judgment, and the concerned respondents will be free to continue the recovery proceedings against her from the stage at which she presently stands and recover the entire amount along with interest and other charges.

(v) It is further made clear that no application for an extension of time will be entertained.

Sd/-

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V JUDGE IAP

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 3272/2024

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

Exhibit1 TRUE COPY OF THE SUMMONS ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 1/09/2023 IN ARC NO.4564/2023

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter