Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5531 Ker
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 27TH MAGHA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 6094 OF 2024
PETITIONERS:
1 GOPIAGED 68 YEARS, S/O NARAYANAN, AMBALATHUPARAMBIL
HOUSE, PULLUR VILLAGE DESOM, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN -
680683
2 VINODINI,AGED 61 YEARS,W/O GOPI, AMBALATHUPARAMBIL
HOUSE, PULLUR VILLAGE DESOM, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN -
680683
3 VIDYA,AGED 33 YEARS,D/O GOPI, AMBALATHUPARAMBIL
HOUSE, PULLUR VILLAGE DESOM, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN -
680683
4 SHABIN,AGED 40 YEARS,S/O BALAKRISHNAN,
AMBALATHUPARAMBIL HOUSE, PULLUR VILLAGE DESOM,
THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680683
BY ADVS.JITHIN BABU A, ARUN SAMUEL,
CLETUS THOTTAPILLY, V.K.SAJIV
RESPONDENTS:
1 PULLUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.550.
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PULLUR P.O., THRISSUR
DISTRICT, PIN - 680683
2 THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
(GENERAL),KALYAN NAGAR, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR,
PIN - 680001
3 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES,
ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF
COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, PIN - 680121
4 SPECIAL SALE OFFICER, KALLUR SCB GROUP, OFFICE OF THE
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES,
MUKUNDAPURAM THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680733
BY SRI. P C SASIDHARAN, SC FOR PULLUR SERVICE
CO-OPERATIVE BANK
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
16.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C).6094 of 2024 2
JUDGMENT
The petitioners are stated to have availed financial
assistance from the 1st respondent bank. It is contended that due to the
financial crisis which has affected the family, they were not able to make
regular remittances by way of repayment. It is contended that they have
now been served with Ext.P1 and P2 notices demanding amounts. They
have been informed that the immovable property mortgaged by them
shall be proceeded with for recovering the amounts. This has led the
petitioners to approach this Court seeing issuance of directions to the
bank to grant the petitioners an opportunity to clear the dues.
2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first
respondent Bank submits that the total outstanding as of date is a sum
of Rs. 52.39 lakhs. Finally, it is submitted that unless if the petitioners
are able to make an afront payment of Rs. 10 lakhs on or before
31.03.2024, the bank is prepared to grant an opportunity to clear out the
outstanding amount but not more than four installments be granted.
3. Upon careful consideration of the submissions made by both
parties, it is evident that the petitioners owe in excess of Rs.52.39 lakhs
st to the 1 respondent Bank. The respondents, very fairly, have agreed to
permit the petitioners to settle these debts through a limited number of
installments. As a measure of last resort, I am inclined to issue directions
to facilitate the petitioners in discharging their financial obligations to the
1st respondent. This approach is deemed necessary to provide a
structured pathway for the petitioners to clear off their monetary
liabilities in a manageable manner.
4. Resultantly, this writ petition is ordered, and the following
directions are issued:
st
(i) The petitioners shall approach the 1
respondent with a request to inform them of the details of the outstanding amount together with interest and other charges due from them in respect of the loan account. If such a request is made within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, the 1st respondent shall forthwith issue a statement in writing detailing the amounts.
(ii) On receipt of such a statement, the petitioners shall pay the amounts shown therein in fifteen (15) equal monthly installments commencing from 15.3.2024, and continue to pay the same on every successive month thereafter until the entire loan is wiped off.
(iii) If the amounts are diligently paid in terms of the directions above, coercive proceedings initiated against them by the respondents for the realization of the amount shall be kept in abeyance.
(iv) It is made clear that if the petitioners commit default of any two installments, they will lose the benefit of this judgment, and the concerned respondents will be free to continue the recovery proceedings against them from the stage at which they presently stand and recover the entire amount along with interest and other charges.
(v) It is further made clear that no application for an extension of time will be entertained.
SD/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V,
JUDGE
DCS
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 6094/2024
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 05.09.2023 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 05.09.2023 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DIRECTING THE PETITIONERS TO PAY RS. 40,05,579/-
Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 08.01.2024 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!