Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Althaf vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 5199 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5199 Ker
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2024

Kerala High Court

Althaf vs State Of Kerala on 15 February, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
    THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 26TH MAGHA, 1945
                        CRL.MC NO. 447 OF 2024
        CRIME NO.1497/2021 OF KAZHAKKUTTOM POLICE STATION,
                          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT CC 1080/2021 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF
                       FIRST CLASS -II,ATTINGAL
 CC 1081/2021 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II,ATTINGAL
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 4:

    1     ALTHAF, AGED 22 YEARS
          S/O SHOFITHA BHEEVI,
          RESIDING AT AL-AMEN MANZIL
          KARIYODE PALLIMUKK CHADAYAMANAGALAM VILLAGE,
          KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, PIN - 695 582.
    2     AHAMADH JUNIAD, AGED 29 YEARS
          S/O NISAMUDHEEN,
          RESIDING AT SAJEEV MANZIL,
          NEAR TO SKV LPS,
          CHADAYAMANAGALAM VILLAGE,
          KOTTARAKKARA TALUK - 695 582.
    3     SHOFITHA BHEEVI, AGED 49 YEARS
          D/O SAFIYA BHEEVI,
          RESIDING AT AL-AMEN MANZIL,
          KARIYODE PALLIMUKK
          CHADAYAMANAGALAM VILLAGE,
          KOTTARAKKARA TALUK P.O, PIN - 695 582.
    4     FATHIMA BHEEVI, AGED 25 YEARS
          D/O SHOFITHA BHEEVI,
          RESIDING AT AL-AMEN MANZIL,
          KARIYODE PALLIMUKK,
          CHADAYAMANAGALAM VILLAGE,
          KOTTARAKKARA TALUK PO, PIN - 695 582.

          BY ADV NAVEEN RADHAKRISHNAN


RESPONDENTS:

    1     STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
          HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682 031.
 CRL.MC NO. 447 OF 2024

                                       2


       2       ABDUL BARI
               AGED 56 YEARS
               S/O SHAHUL HAMMED MUSILYAR,
               AMBALAPALLY HOUSE,
               KAZHAKOOTAM VILLAGE ,
               THIRUVANTHAPURAM DISTRICT - 695 582.


               SRI. NOUSHAD K.A. (PP) /
               SRI. BIJU M. (FOR RESPONDENT)


THIS       CRIMINAL   MISC.   CASE   HAVING   COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
15.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 447 OF 2024

                                                3




                            BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
                       ......................................................
                                 Crl.M.C.No.447 of 2024
                        ...................................................
                  Dated this the 15th day of February, 2024


                                            ORDER

Petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C

to quash all proceedings against them.

2. Petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 4 in C.C.No.1080 of 2021 on the

files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Attingal, arising

out of Crime No.1497/2021 of Kazhakuttam Police Station,

registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323 and 324

r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The second

respondent is the defacto complainant.

3. According to the prosecution, on 15.06.2021, accused assaulted the

de facto complainant with an iron pipe, caused severe injuries, and

thereby committed the offences alleged.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned

counsel for the respondent, apart from the learned Public

Prosecutor.

CRL.MC NO. 447 OF 2024

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter

has been settled and hence the proceedings against the petitioners

ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that, considering the

nature of offences alleged, no purpose would be served by

continuing the proceedings.

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(2012) 10 SCC 303],

the Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases, the High Court

can take note of the amicable resolution of disputes between the

victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal

proceedings. This view was reiterated in Narinder Singh and Others

v. State of Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and Yogendra

Yadav and Others v. State of Jharkhand and Another [(2014) 9 SCC

653].

7. I have perused Annexure-A2 affidavit filed by the second

respondent. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that upon

verification, it is understood that the affidavit is genuine, and the

de facto complainant stands by the contents thereof. I am satisfied

that the matter has been settled and no public interest is involved

in this case. There is no impediment for granting the prayer for CRL.MC NO. 447 OF 2024

quashing. The continuance of the proceedings will only be an

exercise in futility.

Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioners in C.C.No.1080

of 2021 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II,

Attingal, are quashed.

This Crl.M.C is allowed as above.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AMV/16/02/2024 CRL.MC NO. 447 OF 2024

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE A1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO 1497/2021 DATED 15.06.2021 OF KAZHAKUTTAM POLICE STATION ANNEXURE 2 TRUE COPY OF THE ABOVE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD 30.11.23

TRUE COPY

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter