Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chamika Gamage Deshappiya Corrected As ... vs The Superintendent
2024 Latest Caselaw 5136 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5136 Ker
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2024

Kerala High Court

Chamika Gamage Deshappiya Corrected As ... vs The Superintendent on 15 February, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                 PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
         Thursday, the 15th day of February 2024 / 26th Magha, 1945
                           CRL.MC NO. 1424 OF 2024
       CRIME NO.1/2021 OF NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU, KOCHI, ERNAKULAM

      SC 1238/2021 OF I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PETITIONERS/3RD ACCUSED:

     CHAMIKA GAMAGE DESHAPPIYA CORRECTED AS K.M.THARAKA NISHANTHA
     RUPASINGHE, AGED 33 YEARS, S/O.SUNIL RUPASINGHE, NO.4, MAILAGASYA,
     MAILPITIYA, KANDY, SRI LANKA DETAINED AT TRANSIT HOME (DETENTION
     CENTRE), MAYYANAD, KOTTIYAM, KOLLAM, PIN - 691571.

RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT:

  1. THE SUPERINTENDENT, NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU, COCHIN SUB ZONE,
     KOCHI, PIN - 682037.
  2. THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON AND CORRECTIONAL HOME,
     POOJAPPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695012.
  3. FOREIGNERS REGIONAL REGISTRATION OFFICER (FRRO), VAZHUTHACAUD,
     THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014.
  4. THE MANAGER, TRANSIT HOME (DETENTION CENTRE), MAYYANAD, KOTTIYAM,
     KOLLAM, PIN - 691571.
  5. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME
     AFFAIRS, SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001.


     This Criminal Miscellaneous case coming on for orders, upon persuing
the petition and upon hearing the arguments of SMT.NIHARIKA HEMA RAJ,
Advocate for the petitioner, SRI.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR K.R., SPL. PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR for R1 and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for R2, the court passed the
following:
                     BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
                   --------------------------------------
                     Crl.M.C. No.1424 of 2024
                  ---------------------------------------
                Dated this 15th day of February, 2024


                                  ORDER

The learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the first

respondent. The learned Public Prosecutor takes notice for respondents

2 and 4. The learned Central Government Counsel takes notice for

respondents 3 and 5.

2. Petitioner was the third accused in S.C.No.1238/2021 of

Additional Sessions Court, Thiruvananthapuram. He along with other

accused were acquitted by judgment dated 05.09.2023. No appeal

has been filed till date. However, petitioner and other accused are

detained at the Transit Home at Kottiyam, due to absence of travel

documents.

3. The learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent

informed that, they do not intend to prefer any appeal against the

judgment in S.C.No.1238/2021 of the Additional Sessions Court,

Thiruvananthapuram.

4. Despite the absence of an appeal, petitioner and others are

languishing in the detention centre, as they have not obtained travel

documents to return to their native country. It is undoubtedly the

responsibility of the respondents 1 and 3 to initiate appropriate steps

to enable the travel of the petitioner and others back to their native

country. It is submitted that the petitioner is now lodged with the

fourth respondent. In the above circumstances, there will be a

direction to the third and fifth respondents to initiate appropriate steps

immediately, to enable the petitioner to return to his native place,

either by providing appropriate travel documents or by intimating the

Embassy concerned for providing appropriate travel documents and

other requisite documents to enable his return. The needful shall be

done without further delay.

5. Though the learned Central Government Counsel submitted

that it is the responsibility of the Investigating Agency to have

intimated the details of persons who are lodged in the detention centre

and who have been acquitted, I am of the view that, in the present

case, such technicalities shall not stand in the way of the third

respondent initiating proceedings for return of those persons who are

detained at the transit home and who were the accused in

S.C.No.1238/2021 of the Additional Sessions Court,

Thiruvananthapuram. The direction in this order shall be treated as

sufficient intimation.

6. The learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent pointed

out that, necessary steps shall be initiated by the first respondent to

immediately intimate the third respondent for obtaining appropriate

travel documents all those persons as well.

Post on 01.03.2024

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE Jka/15.02.23.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter