Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4775 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 February, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 18TH MAGHA, 1945
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2763 OF 2023
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 23966/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONERS:
1 K.S.R.T.C. PENSIONERS' ORGANISATION (REG.NO.1400/80),
REPRESENTED BY P.A.MOHAMMED ASHARAFF,
S/O. ALIKUNJU LABBA, AGED 74 YEARS, GENERAL SECRETARY,
K.S.R.T.C. PENSION BHAVAN, FORT, KOCHAR ROAD,
THAKARAPARAMBU,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695023
2 K.JOHN
AGED 82 YEARS
S/O.K.V.VARKEY, KANNAMBARAM, PALLOM, KOTTAYAM,
PIN - 686007
BY ADVS.
S.MOHAMMED AL RAFI
THAJUNA MARIA FRANCIS
RESPONDENTS:
1 V.VENU
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS,
CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
2 KESHVENDRA KUMAR IAS
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS,
SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, DEPARTMENT OF
FINANCE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
3 MINI ANTONY IAS
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS THE
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORPORATION, SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
4 BIJU PRABHAKAR IAS
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS,
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT,SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
5 BIJU PRABHAKAR IAS
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS,
MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT
CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT P.O,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695023
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 07.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C)NO.2763/2023 2
JUDGMENT
When this matter was called today, the learned Special
Government Pleader - Sri.Santhosh Kumar, submitted that the
directions in the judgment have been fully complied with and that the
Government of Kerala have issued an order dated 05.02.2024, albeit
rejecting the petitioners' claim, citing financial crisis of the Kerala
State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC).
2. Sri.Mohammed Al Rafi S. - learned counsel for the
petitioners, however, submitted that the new order is illegal and
unlawful because, it denies benefits as are due to his clients; and that
the citing of financial crisis of the KSRTC can never be found to be a
cogent reason.
3. I am afraid that I cannot adjudicate the afore rival positions
in a Contempt of Court case because, I had, through the judgment in
question, only directed that an apposite decision be taken by the
respondents in terms of law. If they have rejected the claims of the
petitioners, then it is for them to challenge the same appropriately;
for which, certainly, they can approach this Court again.
With the afore liberty being reserved to the petitioners, this
Contempt Case is closed; however, clarifying that I have not entered
into the merits of any of the rival contentions and that they are all left
open.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE MC/7.2
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 2763/2023
PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 05/08/2022 IN W.P(C) 23966/2022 Annexure B CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER IN I.A NO1/2023 DATED 08/06/2023 IN W.P(C)23966/2022 BY THIS HON'BLE COURT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!