Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4279 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 12TH MAGHA, 1945
WP(C) NO.7562 OF 2014
PETITIONER:
N.P.BALACHANDRAN
ADVOCATE, S/O.LATE N.S.PARAMESWARA IYER,
NELLISSERY, VADAKKENTHARA P.O., PALAKKAD TALUK AND
DISTRICT - 678 012, RESIDING AT "PRASANTHI",
KALAVAKULAM KOPPAM, PALAKKAD - 678 001.
BY ADVS.
P.B.KRISHNAN
P.B.SUBRAMANYAN
SABU GEORGE
MANU VYASAN PETER
RESPONDENTS:
1 VILLAGE OFFICER
PUDUSSERY EAST VILLAGE, WALAYAR P.O., PALAKKAD
DISTRICT - 678 624.
* 2 MICHAEL MARY, W/O.LATE RAJAPPAN, PAMBUPARA,
CHANDRAPURAM, WALAYAR P.O., PALAKKAD TALUK
AND DISTRICT - 678 624. [DIED]
*ADDL.3 REGINA PHILOMINA CRISTY, D/O.MRS.MICHAEL MARY,
AGED 46 YEARS
*ADDL.4 DHANSEELI ANTHONIU PUZHA, D/O.MRS.MICHAEL MARY,
AGED 46 YEARS
*ADDL.5 CATHALINE NIRMALA SHANTHI, D/O.MRS.MICHAEL MARY,
AGED 46 YEARS
*ADDL.6 THADAIVE AROGYASAMI, S/O.MRS.MICHAEL MARY,
AGED 46 YEARS
*ADDL.7 KUZHANTHAI YESUDAS, S/O.MRS.MICHAEL MARY,
AGED 46 YEARS
WP(C) NO.7562 OF 2014 2
*ADDL.8 JESSYLEEMA ROSSY, D/O.MRS.MICHAEL MARY,
AGED 46 YEARS
* [ADDL.R 3 TO 8 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED
25.07.2014 IN I.A.NO.9913 OF 2014]
BY SRI.SYAMANTAK, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 01.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO.7562 OF 2014 3
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court with
the following prayers:
"(i) Call for the records leading to the decision of the 1st respondent as evidenced in Exhibit P2 reply that pattayam has been booked in relation to 50 cents in R.S. No. 416/1 in the name of one Mrs. Micheal Mary, W/o. Rajappan and quash the same by the issue of a Writ of Certiorari.
(ii) Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent - Village Officer, Pudusserry East Village, Palakkad District to issue possession certificate to the petitioner in relation to 4 cents in R.S.461/1 part situated in Pudussery East Village and accept and continue to accept land tax for the said property from the petitioner. [sic]"
2. When the writ petition came up for
consideration today, the learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that the writ petition can be
disposed of with liberty to approach the
petitioner to Civil Court.
With the said liberty, the writ petition is
closed.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE
sp/01/02/2024
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:-
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DATED 13.12.2013 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED nil ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!