Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Renju vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 9818 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9818 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2024

Kerala High Court

Renju vs State Of Kerala on 4 April, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                        PRESENT
    THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
 THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 15TH CHAITHRA,
                         1946
                CRL.MC NO. 1134 OF 2024
CRIME NO.63/2024 OF NARAKKAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONERS:

   1     RENJU, AGED 39 YEARS
         S/O JOY, THANNIPPILLY HOUSE,
         EDAVANAKKAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT- 682 502.
   2     SAADHIK, AGED 38 YEARS
         S/O.MAAMADH, VACHKKAL, EDAVANAKKAD,
         ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682 502.
         BY ADV C.S.MANU


RESPONDENTS:

   1     STATE OF KERALA
         REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
         HIGH COURT OF KERALA
         ERNAKULAM,, PIN - 682 031.
   2     SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE
         NARAKAL POLICE STATION
         ERNAKULAM DISTRICRT, PIN - 682 505.
   3     UDAYAKUMAR T.P
         AGED 54 YEARS
         S/O.PEZHANGAN, THUNDITHARA,
         THAMARAVATTOM, EDAVANAKKAD
         ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682 502.
         BY ADV UDAYAKUMAR T.P(Party-In-Person)
         SRI.RANJITH T.P., PP
         SRI.VIJAYAKUMAR C.Y., - R2


THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 04.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 1134 OF 2024

                                                2




                            BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
                       ......................................................
                                Crl.M.C.No.1134 of 2024
                        ...................................................
                       Dated this the 4th day of April, 2024


                                            ORDER

Petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C

to quash all proceedings against them.

2. Petitioners are accused Nos.1 & 2 in Crime No.63/2024 of

Narakkal Police Station, registered for the offences punishable

under Sections 452 and 427 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal

Code, 1860. The third respondent is the de facto complainant.

3. According to the prosecution, accused had, on 13.01.2024 got into

a bar where the de facto complainant was working, and after

consuming alcohol, refused to pay the bill, and thereafter,

destroyed the liquor bottle and glasses, and created terror inside

the bar, and caused a loss of Rs.1,000/-, and thereby committed

the offences alleged.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned

counsel for the respondent, apart from the learned Public CRL.MC NO. 1134 OF 2024

Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter

has been settled and hence the proceedings against the petitioners

ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that, considering the

nature of offences alleged, no purpose would be served by

continuing the proceedings.

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(2012) 10 SCC

303], the Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases, the High

Court can take note of the amicable resolution of disputes between

the victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal

proceedings. This view was reiterated in Narinder Singh and

Others v. State of Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and

Yogendra Yadav and Others v. State of Jharkhand and Another

[(2014) 9 SCC 653].

7. I have perused Annexure-A2 affidavit filed by the third

respondent. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that upon

verification, it is understood that the affidavit is genuine, and the

de facto complainant stands by the contents thereof. I am satisfied

that the matter has been settled and no public interest is involved CRL.MC NO. 1134 OF 2024

in this case. There is no impediment for granting the prayer for

quashing. The continuance of the proceedings will only be an

exercise in futility.

8. Though the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the first

petitioner is involved in two murder cases, it is noticed from

Annexure-A3 and Annexure-A4 judgments that in Crime

No.307/2006 and Crime No.1548/2013 by Narakkal Police Station,

the petitioner, who was the first accused, has been acquitted.

Having regard to the nature of allegations in the present case and

the settlement arrived at between the parties, no purpose would

be achieved by continuing the prosecution.

Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioners in Crime

No.63/2024 of Narakkal Police Station, are quashed.

This Crl.M.C is allowed as above.

sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AMV/06/04/2024 CRL.MC NO. 1134 OF 2024

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE A-1 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME. NO. 63 OF 2024 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE'S COURT, NARAKAL , ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

ANNEXURE A-2 A TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT.

ANNEXURE A-3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 29-09-2012 IN SC.NO.327 OF 2010 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE ERNAKULAM.

ANNEXURE A-4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 31-01-2019 IN SC.NO.780 OF 2016 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE -VII.

TRUE COPY

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter