Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anjali K.B vs The State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 9812 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9812 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2024

Kerala High Court

Anjali K.B vs The State Of Kerala on 4 April, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
     THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 15TH CHAITHRA, 1946
                        WP(CRL.) NO. 296 OF 2024
PETITIONER :

          ANJALI K.B
          AGED 29 YEARS
          W/O PRAJITH K.M. KAIPPULLY VEEDU,
          NEW GENERATION ROAD, VELUTHUR P.O.,
          THRISSUR-680 012, PIN - 680012

          BY ADV P.R.SHAJI



RESPONDENTS :

    1     THE STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY,
          GOVERNMENT SECRETERIAT, TRIVANDRUM,
          PIN - 695001

    2     THE STATE POLICE CHIEF
          POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
          PIN - 695001

    3     ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
          STATE CRIME BRANCH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
          PIN - 695001

    4     THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
          CRIME BRANCH, THRISSUR,
          PIN - 680003

    5     THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
          CRIME BRANCH EOW, THRISSUR UNIT,
          THRISSUR, PIN - 680003

          BY SRI.NOUSHAD K.A., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
04.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(CRL.) NO. 296 OF 2024
                                           2




                       BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
                       =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                         W.P.(Crl.) No.296 of 2024
                       =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                     Dated this the 4th day of April, 2024


                                     JUDGMENT

Petitioner's husband Sri. Prajith K.M. was the Director of a company

by name M/s.Safe and Strong Business Consultants Limited. He was

arrested on 11.08.2023 and later various crimes were registered against

him and others.

2. Petitioner alleges that though several crimes have been

registered against the accused who were actually conducting the business

as M/s.Safe and Strong Business Consultants Limited and under other

names, after long periods of incarceration, they have been released by

orders of this Court. However, petitioner continues to remain in jail

despite getting bail in several cases. Petitioner continues in jail since

immediately after bail is granted in one case, police record his arrest in

another case and this continues every time petitioner obtained bail in a

case. As on date, more than 250 cases have been registered and

petitioner submitted that the first accused in all those cases have been

granted bail pursuant to the directions of this Court as seen from Ext.P2,

after recording his arrest. Petitioner seeks similar treatment to be meted

out to him as well.

WP(CRL.) NO. 296 OF 2024

3. I have heard Sri.P.R.Shaji, the learned counsel for the petitioner

as well as Sri.Noushad K.A., the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. On behalf of the respondents, the learned Public Prosecutor

submitted that as on date 272 cases have been registered against the

petitioner in which arrests have been recorded in 271 cases.

5. On a perusal of Ext.P2, it is noticed that in W.P.(Crl) No.381 of

2023, this Court had issued various directions including direction for

recording of arrest in every case registered as on the date of that

judgment and thereafter to issue Section 41A notices.

6. Having regard to the circumstances in the case, this Court is of

the view that the petitioner should also be given the same benefit as in

Ext. P2 judgment.

7. Accordingly, respondents 4 and 5 are directed to record the

arrest of the petitioner in all the crimes registered against him as on date

within a period of one week from today. However, if any case of a similar

nature as those that have already been registered are subsequently filed,

the procedure contemplated under Section 41A Cr.P.C. shall be followed

subject to the condition that if circumstances exist where the

Investigating Officer requires the arrest of the petitioner in crimes to be

registered hereafter, the directions in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar

and Another [(2014) 8 SCC 273] and in Satender Kumar Antil v.

Central Bureau of Investigation and Another [(2022) 10 SCC 51],

and the provisions of Section 41(1)(ii) Cr.P.C. shall scrupulously be WP(CRL.) NO. 296 OF 2024

complied with. Further, the Magistrate concerned shall scrutinize the

need for any detention in such cases with the seriousness it deserves and

not in a routine manners.

With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE RKM WP(CRL.) NO. 296 OF 2024

APPENDIX OF WP(CRL.) 296/2024

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CONNECTION WITH CRIME NO. 47/CBEOW/TSR/2023

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(CRL.)NO.230 AND 381 OF 2023 DATED 25-08-2023

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE BAIL GRANTED IN THE LAST 251ST CASE ALONG WITH THE OTHER CASES BY THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE -III, PALAKKAD ON 24-02-2024

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR NO.1562/2023 OF KANNUR CITY POLICE STATION FILED BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT- I, KANNUR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter