Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10427 Ker
Judgement Date : 30 September, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
SATURDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 8TH ASWINA, 1945
CRL.MC NO. 6409 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT CC 663/2015 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF
FIRST CLASS ,SULTHANBATHERY
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 3:
1 MURALEEDHARAN M.K.
AGED 43 YEARS
S/O. RAMACHANDRAN, AGED 43 YEARS, MALLISSERIKALAM
HOUSE, KUNNAKKAVU P.O., CHERUKARA, ELAMKULAM,
PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679322
2 RATNAKUMARI
AGED 63 YEARS
W/O. RAMACHANDRAN, AGED 63 YEARS, MALLISSERIKALAM
HOUSE, KUNNAKKAVU P.O., CHERUKARA, ELAMKULAM,
PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679322
3 RAMACHANDRAN
AGED 73 YEARS
S/O. APPUNNI NAIR, AGED 73 YEARS, MALLISSERIKALAM
HOUSE, KUNNAKKAVU P.O., CHERUKARA, ELAMKULAM,
PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679322
BY ADV K.RAKESH
RESPONDENT/STATE AND DE FACTO COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAULAM, KOCHI, PIN - 682031
2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
AMBALAVAYAL POLICE STATION, WAYANAD DISTRICT, PIN -
673593
3 NAYANA NAIR
AGED 33 YEARS
D/O. RAMACHANDRAN, PUTHALATH HOUSE, THOMATTUCHAL AMSOM,
CHEENAPULLU DESOM (P O) VADUVAMCHAL, AMBALAVAYAL,
SULTHANBATHERY TALUK, WAYANAD DISTRICT, PIN - 673581
BY ADV PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
SRI. NOUSHAD K.A, PP
ADV.K.S. PRAVEEN
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
30.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
CRL.MC NO. 6409 OF 2023 2
ORDER
Petitioners are the accused in Crime No.390/2015 of
Ambalavayal police station, Wayanad district, which is now
pending as C.C. No.663/2015 on the file of the Judicial First
Class Magistrate Court-I, Sulthanbathery, alleging commission of
offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323 and 506(1) r/w.
34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would
submit that the entire issues between the petitioners and the 3 rd
respondent (the de facto complainant) have been settled.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners also refers to
Annexure-B affidavit executed by the 3 rd respondent to establish
that the entire issues between the petitioners and the 3 rd
respondent have been settled and the 3 rd respondent does not
intend to continue with the proceedings against the petitioners.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel
appearing for the 3rd respondent affirms that the entire disputes
between the petitioners and the 3 rd respondent have been settled
and that the 3rd respondent does not wish to continue with the
proceedings against the petitioners.
4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel
appearing for the 3rd respondent, I am of the view that this
Crl.M.C. can be allowed on the ground of settlement. There is no
public interest involved in continuing the proceedings against
the petitioners. Therefore, in exercise of the jurisdiction vested
in this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, further proceedings against the petitioners can be
quashed on the ground of settlement.
Accordingly, the Crl.M.C is allowed and all further
proceedings in C.C.No.663/2015 on the file of the Judicial First
Class Magistrate Court-I, Sulthanbathery (arising out of Crime
No.390/2015 of Ambalavayal police station) will stand quashed
as against the petitioners.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.
JUDGE ajt
APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 6409/2023
PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A A TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.390/2015 OF THE AMBALAVAYAL POLICE STATION Annexure B AFFIDAVIT EXECUTED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED, 2-8-2023
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!