Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10386 Ker
Judgement Date : 30 September, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
SATURDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 8TH ASWINA,
1945
CRL.MC NO. 5067 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT CC 1141/2022 OF JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II(MOBILE),ALAPPUZHA
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
EDWARD
AGED 55 YEARS, PUNNEKEL HOUSE, WARD 23,
MARARIKULAM SOUTH KALAVOOR PO, ALAPPUZHA,
PIN - 688 522.
BY ADVS.
MANU HARSHAKUMAR
S.GULZAR
ROHIT T.
GOVIND CHANDRABHANU
RESPONDENT/STATE/DE FACTO COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682 031.
2 MARY BASTIN
AGED 43, PUNNEKEL HOUSE, WARD 23,
MARARIKULAM SOUTH KALAVOOR PO, ALAPPUZHA,
PIN - 688 522.
BY ADVS.
JEEVAN BALAKRISHNAN(FOR R2)
ADARSH S
K.A NOUSHAD -SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 30.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.M.C. No.5067 of 2023
:2:
ORDER
Dated this the 30th day of September, 2023
Petitioner is the sole accused in Crime
No.317/2022 of Mannanchery Police Station, Alappuzha
District, which is now pending as C.C. No.1141/2022 on
the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II,
Alappuzha District, alleging commission of offences
punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 354, 506(1) and
509 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
would submit that the entire issues between the
petitioner and the 2nd respondent (the de facto
complainant) have been settled. Learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner also refers to Annexure III
affidavit executed by the 2nd respondent to establish that
the entire issues between the petitioner and the 2 nd
respondent have been settled and the 2nd respondent
does not intend to continue with the proceedings against
the petitioner.
Crl.M.C. No.5067 of 2023
3. Learned Senior Public Prosecutor and the
learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent affirms
that the entire disputes between the petitioner and the
2nd respondent have been settled and that the 2nd
respondent does not wish to continue with the
proceedings against the petitioner.
4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing
for the petitioner, learned Senior Public Prosecutor and
the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent, I
am of the view that this Crl.M.C. can be allowed on the
ground of settlement. There is no public interest
involved in continuing the proceedings against the
petitioner. Keeping in mind the the principles laid down
by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of
Punjab and Another; (2012) 10 SCC 303, and
B.S.Joshi v. State of Haryana; AIR 2003 SC 1386,
further proceedings against the petitioner can be
quashed on the ground of settlement. Crl.M.C. No.5067 of 2023
Accordingly, the Crl.M.C is allowed and all
further proceedings in C.C. No.1141/2022 on the file of
the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Alappuzha
District (Crime No.317/2022 of Mannanchery Police
Station) will stand quashed as against the petitioner.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.
JUDGE AMR Crl.M.C. No.5067 of 2023
APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 5067/2023
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES
Annexure1 TRUE COPY OF FIR AND FIS IN CRIME NO 317/2022 OF MANNANCHERY POLICE STATION.
Annexure II CERTIFIED COPY OF FINAL REPORT IN CC NO 1141/2022 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT II ALAPPUZHA.
Annexure III AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 19.06.2023.
Annexure IV AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT SUBMITTED BEFORE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT II ALAPPUZHA.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!