Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12529 Ker
Judgement Date : 22 November, 2023
WP(C) No.23528/2020 1/4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
Wednesday, the 22nd day of November 2023 / 1st Agrahayana, 1945
IA.NO.1/2023 IN WP(C) NO. 23528 OF 2020
APPLICANT/PETITIONER:
RAJESH T.J., S/O. JANARDHANAN, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (HINDI),
CHERURAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KURUMBATHUR, THIRUNAVAYA,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 301.
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
-695014.
3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MALAPPURAM-676519.
4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, TIRUR-676102.
5. THE MANAGER, CHERURAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KURUMBATHUR,
THIRUNAVAYA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676301.
Application praying that in the circumstances stated in the
affidavit filed therewith the High Court be pleased to direct the
respondents to grant annual increments from 2011 onwards as also
implementation of two pay revision orders and also sanctioning of two
higher grades due to the petitioner, pending disposal of the Writ
Petition.
This Application again coming on for orders upon perusing the
application and the affidavit filed in support thereof, and this Court's
order dated 18.11.2023 and upon hearing the arguments of SRI. GEORGE
ABRAHAM, Advocate for the petitioner in I.A./WP(C), GOVERNMENT PLEADER for
R1 to R4 in I.A./WP(C) and of M/s. V.A.MUHAMMED and M.SAJJAD, Advocates
for R5 in I.A./WP(C), the court passed the following:
p.t.o
WP(C) No.23528/2020 2/4
T.R.RAVI, J.
---------------------------------------------
W.P(C).No.23528 of 2020
------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 22nd day of November, 2023.
ORDER
The prayer in the application is for a direction to
the respondents to grant the annual increments from 2011
onwards and also the implementation of two pay revision
orders and sanctioning of two higher grades due to the
petitioner. The petitioner was placed under suspension and
the disciplinary action culminated in imposing barring of
two increments permanently. Later, the Government passed
orders whereby the cumulative effect was taken away. It is
also stated that the Magistrate's Court has by Ext.P5
acquitted the petitioner. The petitioner hence seeks
exoneration of charges in the writ petition. The petitioner
submits that from 2011 onwards citing the pendency of the
proceedings he is not given the service benefits which are
due to him.
In the above circumstances, there will be a
direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the
petitioner for the annual increments from 2011 onwards and
the fixation of pay in accordance with the two pay revision
orders and the higher grades which are stated to be due to
him and if the petitioner is found eligible, the amounts shall
be paid to him at the earliest. The petitioner may approach
the HM for giving effect to the above directions by raising
necessary bills.
H/o
Sd/-
T.R.RAVI JUDGE LEK
22-11-2023 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 23528/2020
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT IN CC NO.1105/2011 DATED 30/12/2017.
22-11-2023 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!