Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12524 Ker
Judgement Date : 22 November, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA,
1945
WP(C) NO. 38041 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
RAMACHANDRAN T
AGED 74 YEARS
S/O. MADHAVA MENON, 'GOKULAM' THACHAPPILLY HOUSE,
PUZHAKKAL POST, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680553
BY ADVS.
N.M.MADHU
C.S.RAJANI
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, THRISSUR, PIN - 680003
2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER
PUZHAKKAL VILLAGE OFFICE, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN -
680553
OTHER PRESENT:
GP - RIYAL DEVASSY
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 22.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C). No.38041 of 2023 :2:
VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
W.P.(C) No.38041 of 2023
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Dated this the 22nd day of November, 2023
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is the absolute owner and is in possession of
10.56 Ares of land comprised in Sy. No.154/6-2 of Puzhakkal
Village in Thrissur Taluk, obtained as per Ext.P1 sale deed. The
property was included in Ext.P3 data bank. Thereupon the
petitioner submitted Ext.P5 - Form 5 application, which was
allowed as per Ext.P6, removing the property from the data bank.
Thereafter the petitioner preferred Ext.P7 application in Form 6,
wherein as a pre-condition for consideration of the said application,
the petitioner was directed to remit an amount of Rs.3,90,775/- as
conversion fee, as is evident from Ext.P8. Aggrieved by the same,
the petitioner has approached this Court.
2. The petitioner relies on the Division Bench judgment of this
Court in State of Kerala v. Moushmi Ann Jacob [2023 (5)
KHC 337] wherein it is held that if the property is in excess of 25
cents, fees needs to be paid only in respect of property which is in
excess of 25 cents and there is no need to pay fees for 25 cents.
Admittedly the property was obtained by the petitioner as per a
sale deed executed as early as in 1983, much before the
introduction of Section 27A in the Statute and Ext.P4 would show
that the petitioner has constructed a building therein almost 30
years back.
3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am
of the opinion that the petitioner is entitled for the benefit of the
Division Bench judgment in Moushmi's case cited (Supra).
Therefore, Ext.P8 is set aside with a consequential direction to the
1st respondent to reconsider the claim of the petitioner and
consider Ext.P6 application, excluding 25 cents as held by the
Division Bench of this Court in Moushmi's case cited (Supra) and
pass appropriate orders thereon, within an outer limit of one
month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
With the above said directions, the writ petition is disposed
of.
Sd/-
VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE sm/
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 38041/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.3751/1983 DATED 24.11.1983 OF S.R.O. THRISSUR Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE LATEST BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 15.07.2022 FOR THE YEARS 2022-23 Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE DATA BANK REGISTER Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 19.10.2023 ISSUED BY THE ADAT GRAMA PANCHAYAT Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION IN FORM NO.5 DATED 15.07.2022 Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 24.01.2023 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION IN FORM NO.6 DATED 24.02.2023 Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE PAY IN SLIP DATED 31.10.2023 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!