Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Santhosh Kumar G vs Kerala State Road Transport ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 12446 Ker

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12446 Ker
Judgement Date : 22 November, 2023

Kerala High Court

Santhosh Kumar G vs Kerala State Road Transport ... on 22 November, 2023

Author: V Raja Vijayaraghavan

Bench: V Raja Vijayaraghavan

                                                                 1




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                            PRESENT
        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA, 1945
                    WP(C) NO. 38553 OF 2023
PETITIONER:

          SANTHOSH KUMAR G,
          AGED 47 YEARS
          S/O P.K BABU, AGED 47 YEARS, DRIVER GRADE-I, KERALA
          STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
          CENTRAL UNIT, PULLUVILA PADINAJATTATHIL, KADAYIRUPPU
          P.O, KOLENCHERY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,, PIN - 682311

          BY ADVS.
          V.PREMCHAND
          HALIYA T.P.
          MAHADEV M.J.


RESPONDENTS:

    1     KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION,
          REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR,
          TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
          PIN - 695023

    2     CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR,
          KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT
          BHAVAN, FORT P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695023

    3     THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,(ADMINISTRATION & VIGILANCE)
          KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION. TRANSPORT
          BHAVAN, FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695023


          SRI. DEEPU THANKAN, SC FOR KSRTC



     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 22.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 W.P(C)No.38553 of 2023

                                           2




                                  JUDGMENT

The petitioner states that he is employed as Driver Grade I in the

KSRTC. He has approached this Court being aggrieved by Ext.P1 order by

which he has been transferred from Thiruvananthapuram Central Unit to

Nedunkandam. According to the petitioner, though in Ext.P1, it is stated that

the transfer has been effected on administrative grounds, he states that it has

been made with malafide intent.

2. According to the petitioner, Ext.P1 transfer order has been issued

against the petitioner herein and a certain Sunil A T on the strength of a

complaint that the petitioner did not stop the bus at Ambalappuzha though a

passenger had reserved a seat. It is submitted that no disciplinary

proceedings have been initiated against the petitioner or his colleague. He

states that on receipt of the order, Ext.P2 representation was submitted before

the 3rd respondent highlighting his grievances. He states that his wife

Smt.Bindu Santhosh has been diagnosed with ovarian cancer and his presence

is required for providing effective treatment to his sick wife. He states that he

has not been relieved to date. His prayer in this writ petition is for issuance of

directions to the 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P2 representation and to take

a sympathetic view.

3. Sri. Premchand, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

submitted that his limited request is for consideration of Ext.P2 in the light of

Ext.P3 and not to relieve him from the present post till orders are passed on

Ext.P2.

4. It appears that a learned Single Judge of this Court had

interdicted the transfer order by an interim order dated 20.11.2023.

5. The learned Standing Counsel submits that transfer is an

incidence of service and the order has been issued purely on administrative

reasons.

6. I have considered the submissions. I find from Ext.P3 dated

14.02.2023 that the wife of the petitioner has underwent a surgery. The

petitioner has raised certain contentions in Ext.P2 representation. He has

highlighted his grievances and the ailment suffered by his wife. In the facts

and circumstances, I am of the considered opinion that directions can be

issued to the 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P2 representation and take a

decision.

In that view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of directing the

3rd respondent to consider Ext.P2 representation and take a decision with

notice to the petitioner within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy

of this judgment. Till orders are passed, the order dated 20.11.2023 shall

continue.

Sd/-

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, JUDGE IAP

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 38553/2023

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

Exhibit-P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 09.11.2023 ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT OFFICER, KSRTC

Exhibit-P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 14.11.2023 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT

Exhibit-P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF DISCHARGE SUMMARY DATED 14.02.2023 ISSUED BY THE MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, KOLENCHERY

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter