Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5617 Ker
Judgement Date : 12 May, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF MAY 2023 / 22ND VAISAKHA, 1945
BAIL APPL. NO. 2905 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTCMP 164/2023 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF
FIRST CLASS -I, PUNALUR
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 AND 2:
1 REJEENA ABDULLA,
AGED 58 YEARS
W/O.ABDULLA KUTTY, KOTTAKKATTU VADAKKETHIL
HOUSE ,PERINGALA, KAYAMKULAM,
ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 690559
2 ABDULLA KUTTY,
AGED 64 YEARS
KOTTAKKATTU VADAKKETHIL HOUSE PERINGALA,
KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 690559
BY ADVS.
T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF
NITHIN A.R.
RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031
2 SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
PUNALUR POLICE STATION PUNALUR P.O., KOLLAM, PIN -
691305
3 NIZA BAIJU,
AGED 36 YEARS
W/O. LATE MUHAMMED BAIJU NIHAL MANZIL,
VAZHAVILA,VENCHEMPU P.O., NARIKKAL, PUNALUR, KOLLAM,
PIN - 691333
BY ADV.
SRI. P.G. MANU, SR.PP.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
12.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
B.A.No. 2905 of 2023 -2-
P.G. AJITHKUMAR, J.
-------------------------------
B.A.No. 2905 of 2023
--------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 12th day of May, 2023
ORDER
This is an application for anticipatory bail filed
under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973.
2. The petitioners are accused Nos.1 and 2 in
Crime No.240 of 2023 of Punalur Police Station for
having allegedly committed the offences punishable
under Sections 294(1), 406, 420 and 306 of the Indian
Penal Code, 1860.
3. The prosecution case is as follows:
There were money transactions between the petitioners
and the husband of the de facto complainant. Following
the dispute in relation to such transactions, the husband
of the de facto complainant, Sri.Baiju, committed suicide.
The de facto complainant was abused by the petitioners
in connection with the said dispute. The deception and
cheating perpetrated by the petitioners had resulted in
the husband of the de facto complainant committing
suicide.
4. The petitioners would contend that they did not
involve in the alleged crime and without any material or
evidence, they were implicated in the crime.
5. The learned Public Prosecutor opposes grant of
anticipatory bail to the petitioners. It is submitted that
considering the nature of the offence, arrest and
questioning of the petitioners is required and if
anticipatory bail is granted, a proper investigation would
not be possible.
6. It is seen that there were several instances of
money transaction between the petitioners and husband
of the de facto complainant. Others in the family were
also seen involved in such transactions. Whether the
dishonesty and deception by the petitioners was the
proximate reason for the death of the husband of the de
facto complainant has to be investigated into.
Considering the nature of the allegations and the
materials, which would be available, detention of the
petitioners during investigation is appeared unnecessary.
The investigating agency will certainly be able to reach a
logical conclusion in the investigation by questioning the
petitioner and collecting the required evidence.
In the result, the bail application is allowed and the
petitioners are directed to surrender before the
investigating officer within two weeks. After
interrogation and in the event of their being arrested,
they shall be released on bail on the execution of a bond
for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) each, with
two solvent sureties for the like amount each, to the
satisfaction of the investigating officer, and on the
following conditions:
(i) They shall appear before the Investigating Officer on every Tuesday and Friday for a period of three months or till the final report is filed, whichever is earlier;
(ii) They shall not leave the limits of the
jurisdictional court concerned without prior permission of the Magistrate until further orders;
(iii) They shall not go abroad without the permission of the jurisdictional Court and shall surrender their passports before the investigating officer, and in case they do not have passport, they shall file affidavits to that effect;
(iv) They shall not influence or intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence; and
(v) During the bail period, they shall not get involved in any offence.
In case of breach of the bail conditions, the
prosecution shall be at liberty to apply for cancellation of
the bail before the jurisdictional court.
Sd/-
P.G. AJITHKUMAR JUDGE
VV
APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 2905/2023
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure A1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT IN CMP NO.164/2023
Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN W.P.(C) NO.27829/2021 DATED 6/12/2021
Annexure A3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.27829/2021 DATED 21/12/2021
Annexure A4 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 24/5/2023 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!