Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4161 Ker
Judgement Date : 31 March, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 10TH CHAITHRA, 1945
WP(C) NO.10559 OF 2023
PETITIONERS :-
1 KRISHNAPRASAD.R, AGED 36 YEARS
S/O.K.RAMASWAMI, HOUSE NO.148/1,
KUZHIVATTARAM STREET, KUTHAMPULLY POST,
THIRUVILWAMALA, THALAPPILLY TALUK,
THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680 594
2 MEENU.R, AGED 29 YEARS
W/O.KRISHNAPRASAD.R, HOUSE NO.148/1,
KUZHIVATTARAM STREET, KUTHAMPULLY POST,
THIRUVILWAMALA, THALAPPILLY TALUK,
THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680 594
BY ADVS.
R.SREEHARI
HAMZA A.V.
VIGNESH S.
RESPONDENTS :-
1 THIRUVILWAMALA GRAMA PANCHAYATH
THIRUVILWAMALA GRAMA PANCHAYATH OFFICE,
THIRUVILWAMALA POST, THALAPPILLY TALUK,
THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680 588
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
2 THE SECRETARY
THIRUVILWAMALA GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
THIRUVILWAMALA GRAMA PANCHAYATH OFFICE,
THIRUVILWAMALA POST, THALAPPILLY TALUK,
THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680 588
BY SRI.R.RAJPRADEEP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 31.03.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO.10559 OF 2023
-: 2 :-
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 31st day of March, 2023
This writ petition is filed seeking directions to the 2 nd
respondent to consider the application submitted by the petitioners
for building permit.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the
learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Panchayat.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners
that the petitioners are the owners in possession of 14.17 Ares and
5.26 Ares of properties within the jurisdiction of the respondent
Panchayat. It is submitted that an application was submitted by
them for building permit, but the same is not being considered. The
learned counsel for the petitioners submits that it is on a
misapprehension that a development permit is required that the
application is not being considered.
4. Relying on the decision of a Division Bench of this Court
in Panjal Grama Panchayat, Thrissur and another v. Aneesh P [2022
(2) KLT 653] and of a Single Judge in Nafeesa v. Chavakkad
Municipality [2018 (3) KLT 1], the learned counsel for the
petitioners submits that there is no requirement for a development
permit for the consideration of an application for building permit. It WP(C) NO.10559 OF 2023
is submitted that there is no land development or sub division
carried out by the petitioners and therefore, the application is liable
to be considered in accordance with law.
5. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent
Panchayat submits that the application submitted by the petitioners
had been misplaced and that the same will be considered without
further delay.
Having considered the contentions advanced on either
side, there will be a direction to the 2 nd respondent to consider and
pass orders on the application submitted by the petitioners for
building permit within a period of ten days from the date of receipt
of a copy of this judgment. The application will be considered
without insisting on any development permit or certificate, in case
there is no land development as provided in the Rules being carried
out by the petitioners.
This writ petition is ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE
Jvt/31.3.2023 WP(C) NO.10559 OF 2023
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 10559/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTERED SALE DEED NO.978/2019 OF SRO PAZHAYANNUR DATED 04/07/2019, IN FAVOUR OF THE 1ST PETITIONER
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE ISSUED FROM THE KANIYARCODE VILLAGE OFFICE IN FAVOUR OF THE 1ST PETITIONER WITH NO.67689300 DATED 30/08/2022
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTERED SALE DEED NO.1262/2019 OF SRO PAZHAYANNUR DATED 02/09/2019, IN FAVOUR OF THE 2ND PETITIONER
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE ISSUED FROM THE KANIYARCODE VILLAGE OFFICE IN FAVOUR OF THE 2ND PETITIONER WITH NO.67488009 DATED 25/08/2022
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT WITH PLAN SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT ON 12/10/2022, THROUGH E- FILING MODE WITH REGISTRATION NO.1809745
Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA REPORTED IN 2018 (3) KLT 1 [NAFEESA -VS- CHAVAKKAD MUNICIPALITY]
Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA REPORTED IN 2022 (2) KLT 653 [PANJAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH -VS- ANEESH ]
Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN W.P.(C) NO.2787/2023 AND CONNECTED CASES DATED 30/01/2023
Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN W.P.(C) NO.7605/2023 DATED 10/03/2023
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!