Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4000 Ker
Judgement Date : 30 March, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 9TH CHAITHRA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 10382 OF 2023
PETITIONERS:
1 AJMAL
AGED 23 YEARS
SON OF KOYAKUTTY, KALLUPLALIL, PARISHAKALLU,
MANNAMKANDAM, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN - 685561
2 BIBIN SAJU
AGED 29 YEARS
SON OF SAJU,KAKKATHOTTATHIL, IRUMPUPALAM, MUTHIKADU,
MANNAMKANDAM, IDUKKI, PIN - 685561
3 JOBISH K MATHEW
AGED 44 YEARS
SON OF MATHEW, KAITHAMANA PUTHENPURA, IRUMPUPALAM, VALARA
P.O., MANNAMKANDAM, IDUKKI, PIN - 685561
4 EBIN SAJU
AGED 31 YEARS
SON OF SAJU,KAKKATHOTTATHIL, IRUMPUPALAM, MUTHIKKADU,
MANNAMKANDAM, IDUKKI, PIN - 685561
5 DHANISH V KUMAR
AGED 41 YEARS
SON OF KUMARAN, VETTIYAMKUNNEL HOUSE, ADIMALI P.O.,
MANNAMKANDAM, IDUKKI, PIN - 685561
6 RAJAN
AGED 35 YEARS
SON OF MARTIN, PARUTHIVILAYIL, NAIKKUNNU, KOOMBANPARA,
VELLATHUVAL, IDUKKI, PIN - 685561
7 SONU P SAJU
AGED 30 YEARS
SON OF SAJU, PLAPPALLIYIL HOUSE, SENAPATHY P.O.,
VATTAPPARA, IDUKKI, PIN - 685619
8 DIBIN K SHAJI
AGED 29 YEARS
WP(C) NO. 10382 OF 2023 2
SON OF SHAJI, KUNNATH MALAYIL, VALARA P.O., PATHAM MILE,
ADIMALI, DEVIKULAM, IDUKKI, PIN - 685561
9 BIPIN
AGED 29 YEARS
SON OF BABY JOSEPH, ANCHERIL HOUSE, VALARA P.O., DEVIAR
COLONY, ADIMALI, IDUKKI, PIN - 685561
BY ADVS.
IRFAN ZIRAJ
P.M.ZIRAJ
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
ADIMALI POLICE STATION, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN - 685561
2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER
MANNAMKANDAM VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN - 685561
3 THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST
DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, DISTRICT OFFICE, MINI
CIVIL STATION, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI, PIN - 685584
SMT.PARVATHY.K-GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
30.03.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 10382 OF 2023 3
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 30th day of March, 2023
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:-
1. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the first respondent to report the seizure of vehicles of Petitioners bearing registration Nos. KL-40-9001, KL- 54-B-9880, KL-03-S-7254, KL-44-A-4176, KL-06-E-5432, KL- 06-D-6678, KL-62-A-3736, KL-40-A-8659, KL-48-A-9381, KL- 63-3203, KL-11-AV-5346 and a HITACHI before concerned jurisdictional judicial magistrate in the area forthwith.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned
Government Pleader.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that
the first petitioner is the owner of tipper lorry bearing registration KL-
40-9001, second petitioner is the owner of tipper lorry bearing
registration KL-54-B-9880, third petitioner is the owner of tipper lorry
bearing registration No.KL-03-S-7254, fourth petitioner is the owner
of tipper lorry bearing registration No. KL-44-A-4176, fifth petitioner
is the owner of tipper lorries bearing registration No.KL-06-E-5432,
KL-06-D-6678 and a JCB bearing registration No.KL-62-A-3736, sixth
petitioner is the owner of tipper lorry bearing registration No.KL-40-
A-8659, seventh petitioner is the owner of tipper lorry bearing
registration No. KL-48-A-9381, eighth petitioner is the owner of
tipper lorry bearing registration No.KL-63-3203, and ninth petitioner
is the owner of JCB bearing registration No.KL-11-AV-5346 and a
HITACHI. The said vehicles were seized by the second respondent on
20.3.2023 with an allegation of violation of the provisions of Kerala
Minor Mineral Concession Rules 2015 and Mines and
Minerals(Development and Regulation) Act 1957. Inspite of repeated
requests the copy of seizure mahazar has not been handed over to
the petitioners by the second respondent. After seizure the said
vehicles have been handed over to the first respondent by the second
respondent for custody and prepared a seizure mahazar in
connection with the same. Now the vehicles are the custody of the
first respondent.
4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that
the vehicles are liable to be forwarded to the jurisdictional magistrate
and so that, the petitioners will be enabled to make necessary
applications for release of the same.
Having considered the contentions advanced and having heard
the learned Government Pleader also it appears from Ext.P1 that the
seizures have been effected and that the matter has been reported to
the 1st respondent. The 1st respondent shall forward the records
relating to the seizure to the 3rd respondent, if the same has not
already been forwarded, within a period of two days from the date of
receipt of a copy of this judgment. The 3rd respondent shall
thereafter look into the records and if the offences are made out, the
3rd respondent shall report the seizure and forward the records
thereof to the jurisdictional magistrate, at the earliest, at any rate
within a period one week thereafter and to enable the petitioner to
approach the said magistrate with an interim application for release
of the vehicles.
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE ska
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 10382/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 20.3.2023 SUBMITTED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 7.1.2023 IN WPC NO.1459 OF 2023
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!