Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manas vs State Of Kerala
2023 Latest Caselaw 3114 Ker

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3114 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 March, 2023

Kerala High Court
Manas vs State Of Kerala on 23 March, 2023
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                 PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
     THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 2ND CHAITHRA, 1945
                     BAIL APPL. NO. 2233 OF 2023


        (CRIME NO.322/2023 OF IRINJALAKUDA POLICE STATION)

 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CR 322/2023 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
                     OF FIRST CLASS, IRINJALAKUDA
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NOS. 4, 5 AND 6:

    1       MANAS
            AGED 25 YEARS
            S/O.BEERAAN, ARIPURATH HOUSE, VELLANGALLUR DESOM,
            VADAKKUMKARA VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK,
            THRISSUR DISTRICT,, PIN - 680662
    2       EDRIN
            AGED 23 YEARS
            S/O.SEBASTIAN, THEKKEPURAM HOUSE, VELAYAND DESOM,
            VADAKKUMKARA VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK,
            THRISSUR DISTRICT,, PIN - 680662
    3       SAMAD
            AGED 20 YEARS
            S/O.SAHEER, ARAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, VELAYAND DESOM,
            VADAKKUMKARA VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK,
            THRISSUR DISTRICT,, PIN - 680662
            BY ADV N.L.BITTO


RESPONDENT/STATE OF KERALA:

            STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
            HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031
            BY ADV PUBLIC PROSECUTOR


OTHER PRESENT:

            T V NEEMA SRPP


     THIS   BAIL   APPLICATION   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
23.03.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 BAIL APPL. NO. 2233 OF 2023
                                  2



                               ORDER

Dated this the 23rd day of March, 2023

This is a petition filed under Section 439 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking bail and the petitioners

are the accused Nos. 4, 5 and 6 in Crime No.322/2023 of

Irinjalakuda Police Station, Thrissur.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as

well as the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary

as such along with the copy of wound certificate, placed by

the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. The prosecution case in nut shell is that at 09:15

p.m., on 04.03.2023 due to the animosity towards the

defacto complainant and others, since they questioned the

accused persons when smoked cigarettes, accused Nos. 1 to

10 formed themselves into an unlawful assembly, knowing

that they all are the members of the said assembly, in

prosecution of their common object. Thereafter, they abused

the defacto complainant and others, threatened to kill them.

They also beat the friends of the defacto complainant named BAIL APPL. NO. 2233 OF 2023

Ismall and Shanu with a baseball stick. It is alleged further

that when they tried to find shelter at the house owned by

one Salim, A1 and A2 trespassed upon the said house and

again assaulted them. Thereby, the right ring finger of Ismail

got fractured and Shanu sustained injury on his head with

bleeding. On this premise prosecution alleges commission of

offences under Sections 143, 147, 148, 452, 341, 323, 324,

326, 506, 294(b), 308 read with Section 149 of the Indian

Penal Code by the accused.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners would

submit that, the petitioners are innocent and the allegations

are false. According to him, even though Muhammed Ismail

sustained comminuted fracture on left ring finger and others

suffered minor injuries in this occurrence, going by the FIS,

no specific overt acts alleged against the petitioners by using

any weapons. It is also submitted that, Mansoor and Edwin

are the persons alleged to have assaulted Salith and

Muhammed Ismail, by using sticks. Therefore, pointing out

the custody of the petitioners from 05.03.2023 and

highlighting the progress of investigation, the learned BAIL APPL. NO. 2233 OF 2023

counsel for the petitioners pressed for grant of bail to the

petitioners.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed grant of

bail, highlighting the premature stage of investigation as well

as involvement of the 4th accused in Crime No. 106/2019 of

Irinjalakuda Police Station, alleging commission of offence

punishable under Section 160 of IPC. It is also submitted that

5th accused also has involvement in another crime vide

Crime No. 1157/2022 of Irnjalakuda Police Station, alleging

commission of offence punishable under Section 27(b) of the

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (for short

'NDPS Act').

6. Although, criminal antecedents reported in relation

to the 5th accused is one under the NDPS Act, the

involvement of the 4th accused is only in a very minor

offence.

7. In view of the above, taking note of the progress of

the investigation and the custody of the petitioners from

05.03.2023, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail

since further custody of the petitioners, for the purpose of BAIL APPL. NO. 2233 OF 2023

investigation, is not necessary.

Therefore, this petition stands allowed. The

petitioners are enlarged on bail on conditions:

i. The petitioners shall be released on bail on

their executing bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty

Thousand Only) with two solvent sureties, each for the

like amount to the satisfaction of the Jurisdictional court

concerned.

ii. The petitioners shall not intimidate the

witnesses or tamper with evidence. They shall co-

operate with the investigation and shall be available for

trial.

iii. The petitioners shall appear before the

Investigating Officer as and when directed, apart from

appearing before the Investigating Officer on all

Mondays between 9 am and 10 am, for a period of two

months.

iv. The petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly,

make any inducement, threat or promise to any person

acquainted with the facts of this case, so as to dissuade BAIL APPL. NO. 2233 OF 2023

them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any

police officer.

v. The petitioners shall not involve in any other

offence during the currency of bail and any such event,

if reported, or came to the notice of this court, the same

shall be a reason to cancel the bail hereby granted.

Sd/-

A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE LU BAIL APPL. NO. 2233 OF 2023

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 2233/2023

PETITIONER ANNEXURES :

Annexure1 A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.322 OF 2023 OF IRINJALAKUDA POLICE STATION DATED 5/3/2023 Annexure2 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN CRL.MP.2127 OF 2023 BEFORE THE JFCM, NO.1 IRINJALAKUDA, DATED 7/3/2023 Annexure3 A TRUE COPY OF THE REMAND REPORT IN CRIME NO.322 OF 2023 OF IRINJALAKUDA POLICE STATION DATED 7/3/2023

// True Copy // PA To Judge

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter