Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2814 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 43040 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
SHOUKATHALI
AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.IBRAHIM,
1/481, PANGINIKKADAN HOUSE,
KAITHACHIRA P.O., MANNARKKAD,
PALAKKAD - 678 582.
(REGD. OWNER OF KL-10-S-9448 BUS)
BY ADV I.DINESH MENON
RESPONDENT/S:
1 ADITHYAN T.P.
AGED 8 YEARS, (MINOR),
REP. BY MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND RAJANI MOL,
W/O.PRABHAKARAN, MANGALAMKUNNU VEEDU,
ETHIRPANAM, MANNARKKAD,
PALAKKAD DIST. - 678 582.
2 T.P.SREELAKSHMI
AGED 6 YEARS, (MINOR)
REP. BY MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND RAJANI MOL,
W/O.PRABHAKARAN, MANGALAMKUNNU VEEDU,
ETHIRPANAM, MANNARKKAD,
PALAKKAD DIST. - 678 582.
3 KAMALAM
AGED 45 YEARS
W/O.RAJAN, THEKKARA VEEDU,
MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD DIST. - 678 582.
4 SANTHOSH
AGED 30 YEARS
S/O.DAMODHARAN, KORATTIYIL VEEDU,
KAITHACHIRA P.O., MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD - 678 582
(DRIVER OF KL-10-S-9448 BUS).
W.P.(C) No. 43040 of 2022 2
5 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD.
MALABAR FORT BUILDING, G.B.ROAD,
PALAKKAD - 678 001 (INSURER OF KL-10-S-9448 BUS).
BY ADVS.
RAJAN P.KALIYATH
ARCHANA SATISH(K/001719/2022)
SMT MABLE C. KURIAN, SR. GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 01.03.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No. 43040 of 2022 3
JUDGMENT
Separate claim petitions were filed before the Motor Accidents Claims
Tribunal, as O.P.(MV) Nos.433, 434, 457, 458, 459 and 460 of 2012, claiming
compensation for injury sustained by the claimants in a motor vehicle
accident that took place on 28.08.2011. The petitioner herein was arrayed as
the 1st respondent in all the cases. For his failure to appear before the
Tribunal, he was set ex parte and Ext.P1 award was passed on 22.05.2014.
Pursuant to the award, recovery proceedings were initiated against the
petitioner. Contending that the petitioner was unaware of the proceedings
and challenging the recovery, this writ petition is filed.
2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and
the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
3. Having considered the submissions advanced, I am of the
considered opinion that the remedy open to the petitioner is either to
approach the Tribunal concerned or to prefer an appeal challenging the
award passed against him. However, in view of the fervent request made by
the petitioner for a breathing time to pursue his remedies, necessary
directions can be issued.
4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and the submissions
made across the bar, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 3rd
respondent to keep in abeyance the proceedings pursuant to Ext.P1 for a
period of one month to enable the petitioner to exhaust his remedies.
This writ petition is disposed of .
Sd/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, JUDGE NS
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 43040/2022
PETITIONER(S)EXHIBITS :
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON AWARD DATED 22/5/2014 IN OP(MV) NO.433/2012 AND CONNECTED CASES OF MACT, PALAKKAD.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE DRIVING LICENCE OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DRIVER DATED.
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON AWARD DATED 13/11/2014 IN OP(MV) NO.344/2012 AND CONNECTED CASES OF MVACT, OTTAPALAM.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!