Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2763 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2023
CON.CASE(C) NO. 358 OF 2023 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 358 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTWP(C) 14260/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
PETITIONER/S:
1 PANKAJAKSHAN NAIR
AGED 80 YEARS
S/O LATE MADHAVAN PILLAI PALAKKATTU HOUSE RAJAGIRI
VALLEY P.O. KAKKANAD VILLAGE KANAYANNUR TALUK
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682039
2 SARALA GOPINATHAN
AGED 67 YEARS
W/O GOPINATHAN NAIR PALAKKATTU HOUSE KAKKANAD
KANAYANNUR TALUK ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682039
3 RAVEENDRAN PILLAI
AGED 73 YEARS
S/O LATE MADHAVAN PILLAI PALAKKATTUMADOM KAKKANAD
VILLAGE KANAYANNUR TALUK ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN -
682039
4 PADMAVATHY GOPALAKRISHAN
AGED 64 YEARS
W/O GOPALAKRISHAN MULAPPILLIL HOUSE PUTHENCRUZ P.O
PUTHENCRUZ VILLAGE KUNNATHUNADU TALUK ERNAKULAM
DISTRCT, PIN - 682308
5 VANAJA MENON
AGED 61 YEARS
W/O NARAYANANKUTTY MENON AMBALAPPATTU HOUSE
IRUMBANAM P.O THIRUVAMKULAM VILLAGE KANAYANNUR TALUK
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682309
6 PRAKASHINI VENUKUMAR
AGED 57 YEARS
W/O VENUKUMAR LAKKSHMI VILASOM ASAMANNOOR P.O.
CON.CASE(C) NO. 358 OF 2023 2
ASAMANNOOR VILLAGE KUNNATHUNADU TALUK ERNAKULAM
DISTRICT, PIN - 683549
7 SREEDEVI K.M.
AGED 51 YEARS
W/O UNNIKRISHNAN PALAKKATTU HOUSE KAKKANAD VILLAGE
KANAYANNOOR TALUK ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682039
BY ADVS.
S.SHANAVAS KHAN
S.INDU
KALA G.NAMBIAR
RESPONDENT/S:
1 B.ANIL KUMAR
(AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)
MUNICIPAL SECRETARY THRIKKAKARA MUNICIPALITY
MUNICIPAL OFFICE THRIKKAKARA, KAKKANAD ERNAKULAM,
PIN - 682030
2 HARIDASAN T.K
(AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)
THE MUNICIPAL ENGINEER LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT
DEPARTMENT THRIKKAKARA MUNICIPALITY THRIKKAKARA,
KAKKANAD ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682030
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 01.03.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C) NO. 358 OF 2023 3
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
---------------------------------------
Cont. Case (C) No. 358 of 2023
in
W.P.(C.) No.14260 of 2022
--------------------------------------
Dated this the 1st day of March, 2023
JUDGMENT
When this contempt case came up for consideration, the
learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that
an order is passed as directed by this Court and the copy of
the same is given to the counsel appearing for the petitioner.
In the light of the same, there is no contempt in this case. If
the petitioner is aggrieved by that order, the petitioner is free
to challenge that order in accordance with law.
With the above observation, this contempt case is closed.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE SKS
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 358/2023
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 21/07/2022 IN W.P. (C) NO. 14260/2022 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!