Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6772 Ker
Judgement Date : 20 June, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 30TH JYAISHTA, 1945
OP(C) NO. 1244 OF 2023
(AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A.No.1222/2019 IN OP 5/2019 IN
OS.No.80/2022 OF SUB COURT, KANNUR DATED 15.05.2023)
PETITIONERS/PWTITIONERS/PLAINTIFFS:
1 K.N. DINOOP,
AGED 40 YEARS
S/O.KUNHIKANNAN
MELVINA, PLOT 20, POLICE NAGAR, KIZHUTHALLI, THAZHE
CHOVVA, KANNUR - 670018
2 BEENA KARAYI
AGED 50 YEARS
W/O. MURALEEDHARAN, VINAYAKA, NEAR RAILWAY GATE, THAZHE
CHOVVA, KANNUR, PIN - 670018
BY ADVS.
K.MOHANAKANNAN
M.A.ZOHRA
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
1 JAMAL MOHAMMED
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME ARE NOT KNOWN,
ARANHIKKAL COMPLEX, SCHOOL PADI,
PATHEPERIAM P.O,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT -, PIN - 676123
2 SHUBHA,
AGED 60 YEARS
W/O. LATE SIVARAJAN RESIDING AT SIVASAKTHI, KAKKAD,
KANNUR -670005
REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER NIKESH K.V.,
S/O. K.V.PREMARAJAN, AGED 42 YEARS,
RESIDING AT DEVIRAM, VANKULATH VAYAL,
AZHIKODE SOUTH, AZHIKODE P.O.,
KANNUR- 670009
OP(C) NO. 1244 OF 2023 2
3 SHABANA,
AGED 40 YEARS
D/O. LATE SIVARAJAN, RESIDING AT SIVASAKTHI,
KAKKAD, KANNUR - 670005
REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER NIKESH
K.V., S/O. K.V.PREMARAJAN, AGED 42 YEARS, RESIDING
AT DEVIRAM, VANKULATH VAYAL, AZHIKODE SOUTH,
AZHIKODE P.O., KANNUR, PIN -670009
4 DINOOP,
AGED 37 YEARS
S/O. LATE SIVARAJAN, RESIDING AT SIVASAKTHI,
KAKKAD, KANNUR -67005 REPRESENTED BY POWER OF
ATTORNEY HOLDER NIKESH K.V., S/O. K.V.PREMARAJAN,
AGED 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT DEVIRAM, VANKULATH
VAYAL, AZHIKODE SOUTH, AZHIKODE P.O., KANNUR, PIN -
670009
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
20.06.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
OP(C) NO. 1244 OF 2023 3
JUDGMENT
Ext.P8 is an order declining attachment before
judgment at the instance of the plaintiffs who
instituted the suit for recovery of money. It is an
appealable order. The regular remedy available to
the party is not exhausted. On the other hand the
learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that
it would come under the purview of Rule 5 of Order
13 CPC. Rule 5 deals with one of the requirement to
be complied with while passing an order of
attachment. The impugned order will not come under
the purview of Rule 5 and as such, regular appeal is
available. Without prejudice to the right of party
to take up the matter as per lex fori and lex loci,
this O.P(C) will stand dismissed in limine.
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE
LEK
APPENDIX OF OP(C) 1244/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE OP NO. 5/2019 DATED 18/11/2019
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER STATEMENT FILED BY RESPONDENTS 2 TO 5 IN OP 5/2019 OF SUB COURT, KANNUR
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN OP NO. 5/2019 DATED 30/07/2022 OF SUB COURT, KANNUR
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN I.A.
NO. 1/2022 IN CRP NO. 294/2022 DATED 09/11/2022
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN I.A.
NO. 1/2022 IN CRP NO. 294/2022 DATED 13/04/2023
Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE SUIT, O.S. NO. 80/2022
Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION FOR ATTACHMENT FILED AS I.A. NO. 1222/2019
Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN I.A. NO.
1222/2019 IN O.P. NO. 5/2019 IN OS. NO. 80/2022 ON THE FILE OF SUB COURT, KANNUR DATED 15/05/2023
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!