Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7867 Ker
Judgement Date : 26 July, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 4TH SRAVANA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 23787 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
RIYAS, AGED 54 YEARS
S/O ABDUL KHANI, THENGUVILA VEEDU, THEVARTHOTTAM
MURI, THADIKKAD P.O., ANCHAL, ARACKAL VILLAGE,
PUNALUR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691306
BY ADV A.SANIL KUMAR
RESPONDENTS:
1 SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM (RURAL)
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, T.B.JUNCTION,
KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM, PIN - 691506
2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ANCHAL POLICE STATION,
ANCHAL, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691306
3 UDAYAKUMAR, S/O DHARMAJAN, 'NEST", PARIPPALLY P.O.,
KOTTAKKERAM CHERI, ILAMKULAM, PARIPPALY, KOLLAM
TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691574
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI. RAJEEV JYOTHISH GEORGE, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 26.07.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
W.P(C).No.23787/2023 2
P. V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
-------------------------------------------
W.P(C) No.23787 of 2023
-------------------------------------------
Dated this the 26th day of July, 2023
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
i. to issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents Nos. 1 and 2 to consider Ext. P3 complaint and the complaint submitted as per Ext. P4 and to afford sufficient and adequate Police protection to the lives of the petitioner and his family from the 3rd respondent and persons under him;
ii. Issue any such other appropriate writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper considering the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice.
iii. Petitioner undertakes that the English translation of the vernacular documents will be produced as and when directed by this Hon'ble Court.
The main prayer in this writ petition is to issue a direction to
respondents 1 and 2 to consider Exts.P3 and P4 and afford adequate
police protection to the life of the petitioner and his family from the
3rd respondent and his men.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
Government Pleader.
Learned Government Pleader, after getting instructions,
submitted that a complaint is received from the petitioner alleging
threat from the 3rd respondent and the same was enquired into and it
is found that there is no threat from the 3rd respondent. If that is the
case, nothing survives in this case. No notice is also necessary to the
3rd respondent because it is submitted that there is no threat to the
life of the petitioner from the 3rd respondent. If there is any threat to
the life of the petitioner from the 3 rd respondent in future, the
petitioner is free to approach the 2 nd respondent with appropriate
complaint and if such a complaint is received, the 2 nd respondent will
do the needful in accordance to law.
With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
P. V. KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE Sbna/
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 23787/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT FOR SALE DATED 10.03.2022 EXECUTED BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND MR. V.S. JAIN AND OTHERS Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT FOR SALE DATED 29.05.2022 EXECUTED BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 26.06.2023 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT RECEIPT OF PETITION NO.DTN921/2023, DATED 27.06.2023 ISSUED FROM THE ANCHAL POLICE STATION TO THE PETITIONER
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!